TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing models of individual equity option prices
AU - Bakshi, Gurdip
AU - Cao, Charles
AU - Zhong, Zhaodong (Ken)
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Doron Avramov, Nick Bollen, Mike Chernov, Bin Gao, Robert Jarrow, Michael Johannes, Nengjiu Ju, Nikunj Kapadia, Bill Kracaw, Alan Lewis, Dilip Madan, Jun Pan, Ehud Ronn, Lemma Senbet, Kuldeep Shastri, Ken Singleton and participants at the American Finance Association Meetings, European Finance Association Meetings, China International Conference in Finance, Financial Management Association Meetings, and Cornell University’s Derivative Securities Conference. Special thanks go to Cheng-Few Lee (the Editor) and an anonymous referee for their valuable comments and suggestions that have significantly improved the quality of our paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - This article investigates option models in the encompassing class of stochastic volatility, return-jumps, and volatility-jumps. Relying on individual equity options on the 50 most active firms and maximum likelihood estimation method, we obtain several findings. First, while stochastic volatility is as important for individual equity options as it is for index options, return-jumps and volatility-jumps are also essential in pricing individual equity options. Second, the double-jump model improves pricing performance beyond return-jumps absent volatility-jumps, and beyond volatility-jumps absent return-jumps. Third, between return-jumps and volatility-jumps, the former is empirically more relevant than the latter for pricing options; and fourth, the inverse link between volatility-jumps and return-jumps is instrumental for explaining the valuation of deep out-of-money puts and the option dynamics of firms with high kurtosis.
AB - This article investigates option models in the encompassing class of stochastic volatility, return-jumps, and volatility-jumps. Relying on individual equity options on the 50 most active firms and maximum likelihood estimation method, we obtain several findings. First, while stochastic volatility is as important for individual equity options as it is for index options, return-jumps and volatility-jumps are also essential in pricing individual equity options. Second, the double-jump model improves pricing performance beyond return-jumps absent volatility-jumps, and beyond volatility-jumps absent return-jumps. Third, between return-jumps and volatility-jumps, the former is empirically more relevant than the latter for pricing options; and fourth, the inverse link between volatility-jumps and return-jumps is instrumental for explaining the valuation of deep out-of-money puts and the option dynamics of firms with high kurtosis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098962843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098962843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11156-020-00951-4
DO - 10.1007/s11156-020-00951-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098962843
SN - 0924-865X
VL - 57
JO - Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
JF - Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
IS - 1
ER -