TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the efficiency of HIV prevention around the world
T2 - Methods of the PANCEA project
AU - Marseille, Elliot
AU - Dandona, Lalit
AU - Saba, Joseph
AU - McConnel, Coline
AU - Rollins, Brandi
AU - Gaist, Paul
AU - Lundberg, Mattias
AU - Over, Mead
AU - Bertozzi, Stefano
AU - Kahn, James G.
PY - 2004/12
Y1 - 2004/12
N2 - Objective. To develop data collection methods suitable to obtain data to assess the costs, cost-efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of eight types of HIV prevention programs in five countries. Data Sources/Study Setting. Primary data collection from prevention programs for 2002-2003 and prior years, in Uganda, South Africa, India, Mexico, and Russia. Study Design. This study consisted of a retrospective review of HIV prevention programs covering one to several years of data. Key variables include services delivered (outputs), quality indicators, and costs. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Data were collected by trained in-country teams during week-long site visits, by reviewing service and financial records and interviewing program managers and clients. Principal Findings. Preliminary data suggest that the unit cost of HIV prevention programs may be both higher and more variable than previous studies suggest. Conclusions. A mix of standard data collection methods can be successfully implemented across different HIV prevention program types and countries. These methods can provide comprehensive services and cost data, which may carry valuable information for the allocation of HIV prevention resources.
AB - Objective. To develop data collection methods suitable to obtain data to assess the costs, cost-efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of eight types of HIV prevention programs in five countries. Data Sources/Study Setting. Primary data collection from prevention programs for 2002-2003 and prior years, in Uganda, South Africa, India, Mexico, and Russia. Study Design. This study consisted of a retrospective review of HIV prevention programs covering one to several years of data. Key variables include services delivered (outputs), quality indicators, and costs. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Data were collected by trained in-country teams during week-long site visits, by reviewing service and financial records and interviewing program managers and clients. Principal Findings. Preliminary data suggest that the unit cost of HIV prevention programs may be both higher and more variable than previous studies suggest. Conclusions. A mix of standard data collection methods can be successfully implemented across different HIV prevention program types and countries. These methods can provide comprehensive services and cost data, which may carry valuable information for the allocation of HIV prevention resources.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10044233976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10044233976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00329.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00329.x
M3 - Review article
C2 - 15544641
AN - SCOPUS:10044233976
SN - 0017-9124
VL - 39
SP - 1993
EP - 2012
JO - Health Services Research
JF - Health Services Research
IS - 6 II
ER -