TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the Electoral Impact of the 2010 Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review
AU - Gastil, John
AU - Knobloch, Katherine R.
AU - Reedy, Justin
AU - Henkels, Mark
AU - Cramer, Katherine
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The research presented in this report was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences’ Political Science Program (Award No. 0961774) and the University of Washington (UW) Royalty Research Fund. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF or UW.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - The Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review (CIR) distinguishes itself by linking a small deliberative body to the larger electoral process. Since 2010, CIR citizen panels have been a legislatively authorized part of Oregon general elections to promote a more informed electorate. The CIR gathers a representative cross-section of two dozen voters for 5 days of deliberation on a single ballot measure. The process culminates in the citizen panelists writing a Citizens’ Statement that the secretary of state inserts into the official Voters’ Pamphlet sent to each registered voter. This study analyzes the effect of one such Citizens’ Statement from the 2010 general election. In Study 1, an online survey experiment found that reading this Statement influenced Oregon voters’ values trade-offs, issue knowledge, and vote intentions. In Study 2, regression analysis of a cross-sectional phone survey found a parallel association between the Statement’s use and voting choices but yielded some mixed findings.
AB - The Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review (CIR) distinguishes itself by linking a small deliberative body to the larger electoral process. Since 2010, CIR citizen panels have been a legislatively authorized part of Oregon general elections to promote a more informed electorate. The CIR gathers a representative cross-section of two dozen voters for 5 days of deliberation on a single ballot measure. The process culminates in the citizen panelists writing a Citizens’ Statement that the secretary of state inserts into the official Voters’ Pamphlet sent to each registered voter. This study analyzes the effect of one such Citizens’ Statement from the 2010 general election. In Study 1, an online survey experiment found that reading this Statement influenced Oregon voters’ values trade-offs, issue knowledge, and vote intentions. In Study 2, regression analysis of a cross-sectional phone survey found a parallel association between the Statement’s use and voting choices but yielded some mixed findings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044835879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044835879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1532673X17715620
DO - 10.1177/1532673X17715620
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044835879
SN - 1532-673X
VL - 46
SP - 534
EP - 563
JO - American Politics Research
JF - American Politics Research
IS - 3
ER -