TY - JOUR
T1 - Associations between affect variability, mean affect, and mental health among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic
AU - Rahal, Danny
AU - Fosco, Gregory M.
AU - Lanza, Stephanie T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective: The purpose of the study was to test whether associations between affect variability and mental health (i.e., anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, flourishing) differ by mean levels of affect during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: College students (N = 1883; Mage=19.81, SD = 1.33) completed a survey and 21 daily reports of affect (M = 19.41 surveys, SD = 4.19). We calculated mean affect and affect variability (i.e., standard deviation) from daily reports. Regression models then tested associations between positive and negative affect variability and mental health. Results: Participants with higher positive affect variability had higher anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, and surprisingly higher flourishing. Higher negative affect variability was associated with poor mental health for individuals with low mean negative affect, and was associated with better mental health for individuals with high mean negative affect. Conclusion: Affect variability may simultaneously tax mental health for certain individuals and enable others to appreciate daily experiences and have better mental health.
AB - Objective: The purpose of the study was to test whether associations between affect variability and mental health (i.e., anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, flourishing) differ by mean levels of affect during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: College students (N = 1883; Mage=19.81, SD = 1.33) completed a survey and 21 daily reports of affect (M = 19.41 surveys, SD = 4.19). We calculated mean affect and affect variability (i.e., standard deviation) from daily reports. Regression models then tested associations between positive and negative affect variability and mental health. Results: Participants with higher positive affect variability had higher anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, and surprisingly higher flourishing. Higher negative affect variability was associated with poor mental health for individuals with low mean negative affect, and was associated with better mental health for individuals with high mean negative affect. Conclusion: Affect variability may simultaneously tax mental health for certain individuals and enable others to appreciate daily experiences and have better mental health.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216634973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85216634973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07448481.2024.2449428
DO - 10.1080/07448481.2024.2449428
M3 - Article
C2 - 39879529
AN - SCOPUS:85216634973
SN - 0744-8481
JO - Journal of American College Health
JF - Journal of American College Health
ER -