TY - JOUR
T1 - Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion difference in medical studies with bilateral data
AU - Tang, Nian Sheng
AU - Qiu, Shi Fang
AU - Tang, Man Lai
AU - Pei, Yan Bo
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - Bilateral dichotomous data are very common in modern medical comparative studies (e.g. comparison of two treatments in ophthalmologic, orthopaedic and otolaryngologic studies) in which information involving paired organs (e.g. eyes, ears and hips) is available from each subject. In this article, we study various confidence interval estimators for proportion difference based on Wald-type statistics, Fieller theorem, likelihood ratio statistic, score statistics and bootstrap resampling method under the dependence or/and independence models for bilateral binary data. Performance is evaluated with respect to the coverage probability and expected width via simulation studies. Our empirical results show that (1) ignoring the dependence feature of bilateral data could lead to severely incorrect coverage probabilities; and (2) Wald-type, score-type and bootstrap confidence intervals based on the dependence model perform satisfactorily for small to large sample sizes in the sense that their empirical coverage probabilities are close to the pre-specified nominal confidence level and are hence recommended. A real data from an otolaryngologic study is used to illustrate the proposed methods.
AB - Bilateral dichotomous data are very common in modern medical comparative studies (e.g. comparison of two treatments in ophthalmologic, orthopaedic and otolaryngologic studies) in which information involving paired organs (e.g. eyes, ears and hips) is available from each subject. In this article, we study various confidence interval estimators for proportion difference based on Wald-type statistics, Fieller theorem, likelihood ratio statistic, score statistics and bootstrap resampling method under the dependence or/and independence models for bilateral binary data. Performance is evaluated with respect to the coverage probability and expected width via simulation studies. Our empirical results show that (1) ignoring the dependence feature of bilateral data could lead to severely incorrect coverage probabilities; and (2) Wald-type, score-type and bootstrap confidence intervals based on the dependence model perform satisfactorily for small to large sample sizes in the sense that their empirical coverage probabilities are close to the pre-specified nominal confidence level and are hence recommended. A real data from an otolaryngologic study is used to illustrate the proposed methods.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051878090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051878090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0962280209358135
DO - 10.1177/0962280209358135
M3 - Article
C2 - 20181778
AN - SCOPUS:80051878090
SN - 0962-2802
VL - 20
SP - 233
EP - 259
JO - Statistical Methods in Medical Research
JF - Statistical Methods in Medical Research
IS - 3
ER -