TY - JOUR
T1 - Attitudes toward business ethics
T2 - Empirical investigation on different moral philosophies among business students in Vietnam
AU - Clark, Dina
AU - Tanner, Thomas
AU - Pham, Loan N.T.
AU - Lau, Wai Kwan
AU - Nguyen, Lam D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The purpose of this study is to investigate the attitudes toward business ethics of Vietnamese business students based on the five moral philosophies including Machiavellianism, Moral objectivism, legalism, ethical relativism and social Darwinism. Using the 30-item attitudes towards business ethics questionnaire (ATBEQ) developed by Neumann and Reichel (1987) based on the work of Stevens (1979), the authors examined the attitudes toward business ethics of 282 business students at a public university in Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam. It appeared that there was a significant difference between all five philosophies except legalism. Legalism was found only significantly different from moral objectivism. The respondents scored highest for moral objectivism, followed by ethical relativism, social Darwinism, legalism and Machiavellianism. We found a significant difference between male and female business students for Machiavellianism and ethical relativism, and a partially significant difference for legalism. Finally, we found that code of ethics only made a significant difference for only Machiavellianism and social Darwinism.
AB - The purpose of this study is to investigate the attitudes toward business ethics of Vietnamese business students based on the five moral philosophies including Machiavellianism, Moral objectivism, legalism, ethical relativism and social Darwinism. Using the 30-item attitudes towards business ethics questionnaire (ATBEQ) developed by Neumann and Reichel (1987) based on the work of Stevens (1979), the authors examined the attitudes toward business ethics of 282 business students at a public university in Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam. It appeared that there was a significant difference between all five philosophies except legalism. Legalism was found only significantly different from moral objectivism. The respondents scored highest for moral objectivism, followed by ethical relativism, social Darwinism, legalism and Machiavellianism. We found a significant difference between male and female business students for Machiavellianism and ethical relativism, and a partially significant difference for legalism. Finally, we found that code of ethics only made a significant difference for only Machiavellianism and social Darwinism.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083109005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85083109005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1504/IJBGE.2020.106336
DO - 10.1504/IJBGE.2020.106336
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85083109005
SN - 1477-9048
VL - 14
SP - 123
EP - 143
JO - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics
JF - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics
IS - 2
ER -