TY - JOUR
T1 - Back to the front
T2 - Archaeological resources and the planning process
AU - Lawres, Nathan R.
AU - Carter, Andrew
AU - Murtha, Timothy
AU - Brown, Madeline
AU - Mazurczyk, Tara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 National Association of Environmental Professionals.
PY - 2019/10/2
Y1 - 2019/10/2
N2 - While there are standardized methods for incorporating natural resources into planning and design, cultural resources are treated as an afterthought or are considered only after unexpected discoveries or policies require procedural review. Bringing cultural resources to the front end of planning will have positive effects not only on the preservation of those resources, but on planning and design processes. However, to work toward this shift in practice it is necessary to evaluate the types of data useful for planning professionals, which in most cases are evaluative spatial data commonly contained in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) databases. In the United States, statewide cultural resource GIS databases are required in State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPO). While universal, these databases vary in the terminologies used and the types of data recorded, necessitating a move toward standardization and broadened utility. Detailed evaluations of statewide cultural resource GIS databases provide insight into what needs standardization and how to move toward that goal. By moving toward standardization it is possible to bring cultural resources to the front end of the planning and design process. In turn, this will increase cultural resource preservation levels while decreasing the costs of project implementation by reducing the need to revisit project designs after they are put in place.
AB - While there are standardized methods for incorporating natural resources into planning and design, cultural resources are treated as an afterthought or are considered only after unexpected discoveries or policies require procedural review. Bringing cultural resources to the front end of planning will have positive effects not only on the preservation of those resources, but on planning and design processes. However, to work toward this shift in practice it is necessary to evaluate the types of data useful for planning professionals, which in most cases are evaluative spatial data commonly contained in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) databases. In the United States, statewide cultural resource GIS databases are required in State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPO). While universal, these databases vary in the terminologies used and the types of data recorded, necessitating a move toward standardization and broadened utility. Detailed evaluations of statewide cultural resource GIS databases provide insight into what needs standardization and how to move toward that goal. By moving toward standardization it is possible to bring cultural resources to the front end of the planning and design process. In turn, this will increase cultural resource preservation levels while decreasing the costs of project implementation by reducing the need to revisit project designs after they are put in place.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075203511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075203511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14660466.2019.1686914
DO - 10.1080/14660466.2019.1686914
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85075203511
SN - 1466-0466
VL - 21
SP - 189
EP - 200
JO - Environmental Practice
JF - Environmental Practice
IS - 4
ER -