TY - JOUR
T1 - Balancing disturbance and conservation in agroecosystems to improve biological control
AU - Tooker, John F.
AU - O'Neal, Matthew E.
AU - Rodriguez-Saona, Cesar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Disturbances associated with agricultural intensification reduce our ability to achieve sustainable crop production. These disturbances stem from crop-management tactics and can leave crop fields more vulnerable to insect outbreaks, in part because natural-enemy communities often tend to be more susceptible to disturbance than herbivorous pests. Recent research has explored practices that conserve natural-enemy communities and reduce pest outbreaks, revealing that different components of agroecosystems can influence natural-enemy populations. In this review, we consider a range of disturbances that influence pest control provided by natural enemies and how conservation practices can mitigate or counteract disturbance. We use four case studies to illustrate how conservation and disturbance mitigation increase the potential for biological control and provide co-benefits for the broader agroecosystem. To facilitate the adoption of conservation practices that improve top-down control across significant areas of the landscape, these practices will need to provide multifunctional benefits, but should be implemented with natural enemies explicitly in mind.
AB - Disturbances associated with agricultural intensification reduce our ability to achieve sustainable crop production. These disturbances stem from crop-management tactics and can leave crop fields more vulnerable to insect outbreaks, in part because natural-enemy communities often tend to be more susceptible to disturbance than herbivorous pests. Recent research has explored practices that conserve natural-enemy communities and reduce pest outbreaks, revealing that different components of agroecosystems can influence natural-enemy populations. In this review, we consider a range of disturbances that influence pest control provided by natural enemies and how conservation practices can mitigate or counteract disturbance. We use four case studies to illustrate how conservation and disturbance mitigation increase the potential for biological control and provide co-benefits for the broader agroecosystem. To facilitate the adoption of conservation practices that improve top-down control across significant areas of the landscape, these practices will need to provide multifunctional benefits, but should be implemented with natural enemies explicitly in mind.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075502730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075502730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025143
DO - 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025143
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31923378
AN - SCOPUS:85075502730
SN - 0066-4170
VL - 65
SP - 81
EP - 100
JO - Annual Review of Entomology
JF - Annual Review of Entomology
ER -