Abstract
Diagnosing Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile infection can be difficult, especially when there is a lack of consensus in the definition, disagreement on the gold standard, and indecision as to which is the best testing method. As laboratorians, we look to published best practice documents for guidance, but oftentimes, the recommendations are not straightforward. This article reviews the most recent guidance documents published by the Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America, the American College of Gastroenterology, the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, and the American Society for Microbiology. Recommendations for the desired testing population, most accurate diagnostic test or testing algorithm, and frequency of testing are compared between the societies. A review of the guidance methodologies is provided, and strategies for laboratory adoption are discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 175-183 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Clinical Microbiology Newsletter |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 20 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 15 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Microbiology (medical)
- Infectious Diseases
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Battleground Zero: A Review of Best Practice Recommendations for Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver