TY - JOUR
T1 - Benchmark problems for transcranial ultrasound simulation
T2 - Intercomparison of compressional wave models
AU - Aubry, Jean Francois
AU - Bates, Oscar
AU - Boehm, Christian
AU - Butts Pauly, Kim
AU - Christensen, Douglas
AU - Cueto, Carlos
AU - Gélat, Pierre
AU - Guasch, Lluis
AU - Jaros, Jiri
AU - Jing, Yun
AU - Jones, Rebecca
AU - Li, Ningrui
AU - Marty, Patrick
AU - Montanaro, Hazael
AU - Neufeld, Esra
AU - Pichardo, Samuel
AU - Pinton, Gianmarco
AU - Pulkkinen, Aki
AU - Stanziola, Antonio
AU - Thielscher, Axel
AU - Treeby, Bradley
AU - Van 'T Wout, Elwin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Author(s).
PY - 2022/8/1
Y1 - 2022/8/1
N2 - Computational models of acoustic wave propagation are frequently used in transcranial ultrasound therapy, for example, to calculate the intracranial pressure field or to calculate phase delays to correct for skull distortions. To allow intercomparison between the different modeling tools and techniques used by the community, an international working group was convened to formulate a set of numerical benchmarks. Here, these benchmarks are presented, along with intercomparison results. Nine different benchmarks of increasing geometric complexity are defined. These include a single-layer planar bone immersed in water, a multi-layer bone, and a whole skull. Two transducer configurations are considered (a focused bowl and a plane piston operating at 500 kHz), giving a total of 18 permutations of the benchmarks. Eleven different modeling tools are used to compute the benchmark results. The models span a wide range of numerical techniques, including the finite-difference time-domain method, angular spectrum method, pseudospectral method, boundary-element method, and spectral-element method. Good agreement is found between the models, particularly for the position, size, and magnitude of the acoustic focus within the skull. When comparing results for each model with every other model in a cross-comparison, the median values for each benchmark for the difference in focal pressure and position are less than 10% and 1 mm, respectively. The benchmark definitions, model results, and intercomparison codes are freely available to facilitate further comparisons.
AB - Computational models of acoustic wave propagation are frequently used in transcranial ultrasound therapy, for example, to calculate the intracranial pressure field or to calculate phase delays to correct for skull distortions. To allow intercomparison between the different modeling tools and techniques used by the community, an international working group was convened to formulate a set of numerical benchmarks. Here, these benchmarks are presented, along with intercomparison results. Nine different benchmarks of increasing geometric complexity are defined. These include a single-layer planar bone immersed in water, a multi-layer bone, and a whole skull. Two transducer configurations are considered (a focused bowl and a plane piston operating at 500 kHz), giving a total of 18 permutations of the benchmarks. Eleven different modeling tools are used to compute the benchmark results. The models span a wide range of numerical techniques, including the finite-difference time-domain method, angular spectrum method, pseudospectral method, boundary-element method, and spectral-element method. Good agreement is found between the models, particularly for the position, size, and magnitude of the acoustic focus within the skull. When comparing results for each model with every other model in a cross-comparison, the median values for each benchmark for the difference in focal pressure and position are less than 10% and 1 mm, respectively. The benchmark definitions, model results, and intercomparison codes are freely available to facilitate further comparisons.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137061715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85137061715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1121/10.0013426
DO - 10.1121/10.0013426
M3 - Article
C2 - 36050189
AN - SCOPUS:85137061715
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 152
SP - 1003
EP - 1019
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 2
ER -