Best practices for considering retractions

John E. Edlund; Bradley M. Okdie; Cory R. Scherer

doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03764-x

Best practices for considering retractions

John E. Edlund
, Bradley M. Okdie
, Cory R. Scherer

Penn State Schuylkill

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although retractions have been occurring in journals for many years, there is little standardization on what should warrant a retraction and how the retraction should be handled. In this manuscript, we lay out six broad classes for why retractions should be considered. We also lay out best practices for journals approaching a manuscript for which concerns have been raised.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	16015-16022
Number of pages	8
Journal	Current Psychology
Volume	43
Issue number	17
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03764-x
State	Published - May 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

General Psychology

Access to Document

10.1007/s12144-022-03764-x

Cite this

@article{22869a2dc9294039874880f76d179a7e,

title = "Best practices for considering retractions",

abstract = "Although retractions have been occurring in journals for many years, there is little standardization on what should warrant a retraction and how the retraction should be handled. In this manuscript, we lay out six broad classes for why retractions should be considered. We also lay out best practices for journals approaching a manuscript for which concerns have been raised.",

author = "Edlund, \{John E.\} and Okdie, \{Bradley M.\} and Scherer, \{Cory R.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.",

year = "2024",

month = may,

doi = "10.1007/s12144-022-03764-x",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "43",

pages = "16015--16022",

journal = "Current Psychology",

issn = "1046-1310",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Best practices for considering retractions

AU - Edlund, John E.

AU - Okdie, Bradley M.

AU - Scherer, Cory R.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

PY - 2024/5

Y1 - 2024/5

N2 - Although retractions have been occurring in journals for many years, there is little standardization on what should warrant a retraction and how the retraction should be handled. In this manuscript, we lay out six broad classes for why retractions should be considered. We also lay out best practices for journals approaching a manuscript for which concerns have been raised.

AB - Although retractions have been occurring in journals for many years, there is little standardization on what should warrant a retraction and how the retraction should be handled. In this manuscript, we lay out six broad classes for why retractions should be considered. We also lay out best practices for journals approaching a manuscript for which concerns have been raised.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85140650391

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85140650391#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1007/s12144-022-03764-x

DO - 10.1007/s12144-022-03764-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85140650391

SN - 1046-1310

VL - 43

SP - 16015

EP - 16022

JO - Current Psychology

JF - Current Psychology

IS - 17

ER -

Best practices for considering retractions

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this