TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond Differences
T2 - Assessing Effects of Shared Linguistic Features on L2 Writing Quality of Two Genres
AU - Zhang, Xiaopeng
AU - Lu, Xiaofei
AU - Li, Wenwen
N1 - Funding Information:
We wish to express our gratitude to Anna Mauranen, co-editor of Applied Linguistics, and five anonymous reviewers for their excellent suggestions in revising this manuscript. We also thank Beijing Waiyan Online Digital Technology Co., Ltd for providing us with the dataset.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s).
PY - 2022/2/1
Y1 - 2022/2/1
N2 - This study explored the relationship between linguistic features and the rated quality of letters of application (LAs) and argumentative essays (AEs) composed in English by Chinese college-level English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. A corpus of 260 LAs and 260 AEs were analyzed via a confirmatory factor analysis. Latent variables were EFL writing quality, captured by writing scores, and lexical sophistication, syntactic complexity, and cohesion, each captured by different linguistic features in the two genres of writing. Results indicated that lexical decision times, moving average type-token ratio with a 50-word window, and complex nominals per clause explained 55.5 per cent of the variance in the holistic scores of both genres of writing. This pattern of predictivity was further validated with a test corpus of 110 LAs and 110 AEs, revealing that, albeit differing in genre, higher-rated LAs and AEs were likely to contain more sophisticated words and complex nominals and exhibit a higher type-token ratio with a 50-word window. These findings help enrich our understanding of the shared features of different genres of EFL writing and have potentially useful implications for EFL writing pedagogy and assessment.
AB - This study explored the relationship between linguistic features and the rated quality of letters of application (LAs) and argumentative essays (AEs) composed in English by Chinese college-level English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. A corpus of 260 LAs and 260 AEs were analyzed via a confirmatory factor analysis. Latent variables were EFL writing quality, captured by writing scores, and lexical sophistication, syntactic complexity, and cohesion, each captured by different linguistic features in the two genres of writing. Results indicated that lexical decision times, moving average type-token ratio with a 50-word window, and complex nominals per clause explained 55.5 per cent of the variance in the holistic scores of both genres of writing. This pattern of predictivity was further validated with a test corpus of 110 LAs and 110 AEs, revealing that, albeit differing in genre, higher-rated LAs and AEs were likely to contain more sophisticated words and complex nominals and exhibit a higher type-token ratio with a 50-word window. These findings help enrich our understanding of the shared features of different genres of EFL writing and have potentially useful implications for EFL writing pedagogy and assessment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120458482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120458482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/applin/amab007
DO - 10.1093/applin/amab007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85120458482
SN - 0142-6001
VL - 43
SP - 168
EP - 195
JO - Applied Linguistics
JF - Applied Linguistics
IS - 1
ER -