TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond use
T2 - Understanding evaluation's influence on attitudes and actions
AU - Henry, Gary T.
AU - Mark, Melvin M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Elliott Stern, Peter Dahler-Larsen, Leslie Cooksey, Valerie Caracelli, and Brad Cousins as well as three anonymous reviewers for their comments on drafts of this paper. All errors and interpretations are the responsibility of the authors. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the American Evaluation Association annual meeting in St. Louis, MO, November 11, 2001 and the European Evaluation Society meetings in Seville, Spain, October 12, 2002. The paper was supported by NSF Grant REC-0231859 to Melvin M. Mark.
PY - 2003/9
Y1 - 2003/9
N2 - Although use is a core construct in the field of evaluation, neither the change processes through which evaluation affects attitudes, beliefs, and actions, nor the interim outcomes that lie between the evaluation and its ultimate goal-social betterment-have been sufficiently developed. We draw a number of these change mechanisms, such as justification, persuasion, and policy diffusion, from the social science research literature, and organize them into a framework that has three levels: individual, interpersonal, and collective. We illustrate how these change processes can be linked together to form "pathways" or working hypotheses that link evaluation processes to outcomes that move us along the road toward the goal of social betterment. In addition, we join with Kirkhart (2000) in moving beyond use, to focus our thinking on evaluation influence. Influence, combined with the set of mechanisms and interim outcomes presented here, offers a better way for thinking about, communicating, and adding to the evidence base about the consequences of evaluation and the relationship of evaluation to social betterment.
AB - Although use is a core construct in the field of evaluation, neither the change processes through which evaluation affects attitudes, beliefs, and actions, nor the interim outcomes that lie between the evaluation and its ultimate goal-social betterment-have been sufficiently developed. We draw a number of these change mechanisms, such as justification, persuasion, and policy diffusion, from the social science research literature, and organize them into a framework that has three levels: individual, interpersonal, and collective. We illustrate how these change processes can be linked together to form "pathways" or working hypotheses that link evaluation processes to outcomes that move us along the road toward the goal of social betterment. In addition, we join with Kirkhart (2000) in moving beyond use, to focus our thinking on evaluation influence. Influence, combined with the set of mechanisms and interim outcomes presented here, offers a better way for thinking about, communicating, and adding to the evidence base about the consequences of evaluation and the relationship of evaluation to social betterment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142119445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142119445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1098-2140(03)00056-0
DO - 10.1016/S1098-2140(03)00056-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0142119445
SN - 1098-2140
VL - 24
SP - 293
EP - 314
JO - American Journal of Evaluation
JF - American Journal of Evaluation
IS - 3
ER -