Abstract
Escaping from the sack of Amida in 359, the historian Ammianus Marcellinus encountered a runaway horse pulling behind it the dead body of a groom who had tied himself to the horse and fallen off (19.8.6–7). The article argues that errors in text and punctuation and a lack of equestrian knowledge have led to an illogical interpretation of the passage. Where most translators describe the groom being tied to the reins, we should understand habena as a halter used to guide the animal from on foot. Prose rhythm implies that ne labi possit ex more should be taken as a single clause, meaning ‘in the usual manner to stop [the horse] escaping’. Moreover, attention to prose rhythm and Ammianus’ usage also shows that we should further emend sedens to insidens.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Journal | Classical Quarterly |
| DOIs | |
| State | Accepted/In press - 2026 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Classics
- History
- Philosophy
- Literature and Literary Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'BITS AND BRIDLES: A NOTE ON AMMIANUS MARCELLINUS 19.8.7'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver