TY - JOUR
T1 - Blue and red tides in the Chesapeake Bay watershed
T2 - Examining political and environmental framings of collective action during the 2016 and 2020 elections
AU - Mainzer, Stephen
AU - Pakhtigian, Emily L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Mainzer, Pakhtigian. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Watersheds require collective care and management at local and regional levels to maintain their ecological health. The Chesapeake Bay's last several decades of stagnantly poor ecological health presents a distinctive case study for explicating the challenges of motivating collective action across a diverse regional natural resource. Our study uses county- and individual-level descriptive analysis to examine interrelated framings of environmental quality, environmental sentiment, and political action at two critical moments in time-the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. We find that demographic, environmental, and political characteristics vary with distance to the Chesapeake Bay and that linked environmental and political characteristics appeared to become more polarized between 2016 and 2020. We found no evidence that local environmental quality influenced new political actions such as voting; however, people already likely to vote were influenced by their pro-environmental values such as priorities around climate change.
AB - Watersheds require collective care and management at local and regional levels to maintain their ecological health. The Chesapeake Bay's last several decades of stagnantly poor ecological health presents a distinctive case study for explicating the challenges of motivating collective action across a diverse regional natural resource. Our study uses county- and individual-level descriptive analysis to examine interrelated framings of environmental quality, environmental sentiment, and political action at two critical moments in time-the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. We find that demographic, environmental, and political characteristics vary with distance to the Chesapeake Bay and that linked environmental and political characteristics appeared to become more polarized between 2016 and 2020. We found no evidence that local environmental quality influenced new political actions such as voting; however, people already likely to vote were influenced by their pro-environmental values such as priorities around climate change.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196833830&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85196833830&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0298962
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0298962
M3 - Article
C2 - 38905270
AN - SCOPUS:85196833830
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 19
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 6 June
M1 - e0298962
ER -