Body burdens of polybrominated diphenyl ethers among urban anglers

Kimberly B. Morland, Philip J. Landrigan, Andreas Sjödin, Alayne K. Gobeille, Richard S. Jones, Ernest E. McGahee, Larry L. Needham, Donald G. Patterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

55 Scopus citations

Abstract

Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) have been widely used in the United States and worldwide as flame retardants. Recent PBDE production figures show that worldwide use has increased. To determine whether fish consumption is a source of PBDE exposure for humans, a cross-sectional epidemiologic study of New York and New Jersey urban anglers was conducted during the summers of 2001-2003. Frequency of local fish consumption was assessed by questionnaire, and blood samples for PBDE analysis were collected from 94 anglers fishing from piers on the lower Hudson River and Newark Bay. We analyzed PBDEs by gas chromatography-isotope dilution-high-resolution mass spectrometry. The congeners found in anglers' serum at the highest concentrations were, by International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry numbers, BDE-47, BDE-153, and BDE-99. Anglers reporting consumption of local fish had higher, but nonstatistically significantly different, concentrations of PBDEs than did anglers who did not eat local fish. For some congeners (BDE-100 and BDE-153), we observed moderate dose-response relationships between serum PBDE levels and frequency of reported fish intake. These findings suggest that consumption of locally caught fish is not a major route of human exposure for this study population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1689-1692
Number of pages4
JournalEnvironmental health perspectives
Volume113
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Body burdens of polybrominated diphenyl ethers among urban anglers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this