TY - JOUR
T1 - Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients
T2 - a multicenter retrospective comparative analysis
AU - Suzuki, Kazuhito
AU - Tsukada, Nobuhiro
AU - Nishimura, Noriko
AU - Nagata, Yasuyuki
AU - Okazuka, Kiyoshi
AU - Mishima, Yuko
AU - Yokoyama, Masahiro
AU - Nishiwaki, Kaichi
AU - Ishida, Tadao
AU - Yano, Shingo
AU - Terui, Yasuhito
AU - Suzuki, Kenshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Japanese Society of Hematology.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - The combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) is used as induction treatment in multiple myeloma; however, the optimum schedule for this regimen remains controversial. In this retrospective study, we compared the efficacy and tolerability of twice-weekly VRD (twVRD) and modified VRD-lite in transplant-eligible myeloma patients. Fifty-five patients (median age 61 years) were included; 22 received twVRD (bortezomib [1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11] and lenalidomide [25 mg/body on days 1–14] over 21-day cycles) and 33 received modified VRD-lite (bortezomib [1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) and lenalidomide [15 mg/body on days 2–7, 9–14, 16–21] over 28-day cycles). Overall response, very good partial response, and complete response rates after VRD were 96.4%, 45.5%, and 20.0%, respectively (median follow-up period, 17.7 months). The 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 95.8% and 98.2%, respectively. The response rate and PFS were similar between the groups, regardless of cytogenetic risk and age. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2 and thrombocytopenia ≥ grade 3 was higher in the twVRD group (27.2% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.003 and 27.2% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.003). In conclusion, modified VRD-lite had similar efficacy with, but better tolerability than, twVRD in transplant-eligible patients.
AB - The combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) is used as induction treatment in multiple myeloma; however, the optimum schedule for this regimen remains controversial. In this retrospective study, we compared the efficacy and tolerability of twice-weekly VRD (twVRD) and modified VRD-lite in transplant-eligible myeloma patients. Fifty-five patients (median age 61 years) were included; 22 received twVRD (bortezomib [1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11] and lenalidomide [25 mg/body on days 1–14] over 21-day cycles) and 33 received modified VRD-lite (bortezomib [1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) and lenalidomide [15 mg/body on days 2–7, 9–14, 16–21] over 28-day cycles). Overall response, very good partial response, and complete response rates after VRD were 96.4%, 45.5%, and 20.0%, respectively (median follow-up period, 17.7 months). The 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 95.8% and 98.2%, respectively. The response rate and PFS were similar between the groups, regardless of cytogenetic risk and age. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2 and thrombocytopenia ≥ grade 3 was higher in the twVRD group (27.2% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.003 and 27.2% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.003). In conclusion, modified VRD-lite had similar efficacy with, but better tolerability than, twVRD in transplant-eligible patients.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85074716193
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074716193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12185-019-02764-1
DO - 10.1007/s12185-019-02764-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 31673952
AN - SCOPUS:85074716193
SN - 0925-5710
VL - 111
SP - 103
EP - 111
JO - International journal of hematology
JF - International journal of hematology
IS - 1
ER -