TY - JOUR
T1 - Building a community of ethics educators in graduate engineering programs
T2 - 124th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
AU - Tang, Xiaofeng
AU - Mendieta, Eduardo
AU - Litzinger, Thomas A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Ethics deatuion in undec rgraduate nenegering prograi msent odtou sfcosthcnalissi uese that raseinihe proftessional ocextn. By ctontrast, ethics deatuion for grac duate tusntds e in engineering often addresses fdferenti nkdiothescfalihcllengeas, ones htt alrteeot norms naxpedcta tionsenihe srtearceh community as ewll saht bedroci aolsmipactaof engineering research. In recentyears, leading organizationsush acstheNationalcSience Foundation (NSF), the National Institutes of eHalth (NIH) and the National cAademy of Engineering(NAE)have amde igsficnant iffeos ortt otpe thercsoirtinamniogrdua ftegra researchers. In spiteofhtseeocertned efcforts, fewustainasbleomlsdofneroc riting pora ethics ni dua gte nrenagerneiigm sphvrabeeonesgc rdbirdneeah itletrtua. Ars e designers of thecs ideatuion prograc ms, we raghttuoaceidnrbleaespsrs aocng bree achieved through engaging and empowering our users—thenenegering fiaculty members who teach graduate oceus nardvidsse gadtreutausandsnties arrh groupsce .
Publisher Copyright:
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.
PY - 2017/6/24
Y1 - 2017/6/24
N2 - Ethics education in undergraduate engineering programs tends to focus on ethical issues that arise in the professional context. By contrast, ethics education for graduate students in engineering often addresses different kinds of ethical challenges, ones that relate to norms and expectations in the research community as well as the broad social impact of engineering research. In recent years, leading organizations such as the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) have made significant efforts to promote ethics training for graduate researchers. In spite of these concerted efforts, few sustainable models for incorporating ethics in graduate engineering programs have been described in the literature. As designers of ethics education programs, we argue that considerable progress can be achieved through engaging and empowering our users-the engineering faculty members who teach graduate courses and advise graduate students in research groups. This paper presents a user-oriented approach to building a community of ethics educators in graduate engineering education. We begin the paper by reporting our "user study" of engineering faculty's current approaches, challenges, and needs for teaching ethics to graduate students at a large, public research university. Findings of the user study guided our design of a workshop on "Ethical Literacy and Ethical Data Management" that helped engineering faculty members develop conceptual understanding and instructional skills for teaching ethical inquiry that are related to particular areas of engineering research. Design of the workshop sought to meet three objectives: 1) helping participating faculty members develop basic understanding of ethical theories and concepts; 2) introducing ethical issues related with engineering research, especially with the handling of research data; 3) sharing and demonstrating instructional methods for leading discussion-based ethical analysis. Feedback from the workshop participants and their subsequent presentations of ethics teaching plans indicate that our user-oriented approach successfully engaged a cohort of ethics educators in graduate engineering programs. We conclude this paper by reflecting on the lessons we learned from the workshop design and reporting our plans for refining the workshop in the future.
AB - Ethics education in undergraduate engineering programs tends to focus on ethical issues that arise in the professional context. By contrast, ethics education for graduate students in engineering often addresses different kinds of ethical challenges, ones that relate to norms and expectations in the research community as well as the broad social impact of engineering research. In recent years, leading organizations such as the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) have made significant efforts to promote ethics training for graduate researchers. In spite of these concerted efforts, few sustainable models for incorporating ethics in graduate engineering programs have been described in the literature. As designers of ethics education programs, we argue that considerable progress can be achieved through engaging and empowering our users-the engineering faculty members who teach graduate courses and advise graduate students in research groups. This paper presents a user-oriented approach to building a community of ethics educators in graduate engineering education. We begin the paper by reporting our "user study" of engineering faculty's current approaches, challenges, and needs for teaching ethics to graduate students at a large, public research university. Findings of the user study guided our design of a workshop on "Ethical Literacy and Ethical Data Management" that helped engineering faculty members develop conceptual understanding and instructional skills for teaching ethical inquiry that are related to particular areas of engineering research. Design of the workshop sought to meet three objectives: 1) helping participating faculty members develop basic understanding of ethical theories and concepts; 2) introducing ethical issues related with engineering research, especially with the handling of research data; 3) sharing and demonstrating instructional methods for leading discussion-based ethical analysis. Feedback from the workshop participants and their subsequent presentations of ethics teaching plans indicate that our user-oriented approach successfully engaged a cohort of ethics educators in graduate engineering programs. We conclude this paper by reflecting on the lessons we learned from the workshop design and reporting our plans for refining the workshop in the future.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030537592&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030537592&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85030537592
SN - 2153-5965
VL - 2017-June
JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
Y2 - 25 June 2017 through 28 June 2017
ER -