TY - JOUR
T1 - Bundled payment for actinic keratosis management
T2 - Pilot evaluation of developed models
AU - Kirby, Joslyn S.
AU - Silva, Colleen F.
AU - Ferguson, Sara B.
AU - Shupp, David
AU - Marks, James G.
AU - Miller, Jeffrey J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Background: There is an opportunity to explore alternate payment models in dermatology. Objective: To pilot 2 bundled payment models for actinic keratosis (AK) management. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted during September 2013-June 2016. Consecutive patients were recruited from clinics of 5 dermatologists. Patients had to be adults, have ≥1 year of care at the department, and have a history of AK. A bundled payment strategy was prospectively piloted for 1 year and compared with costs in the prior year. Results: Overall, 400 participants were enrolled, and complete data was collected for 254 participants. During the year of bundled payments, actual total annual spending on claims was $70,557, whereas model 1 and model 2 bundled payment models would have totaled $67,310 and $74,422, respectively, for the patient cohort. Patient satisfaction surveys showed no difference in the quality of care. Limitations: Single-center study and limited sample size. International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 codes were used to identify claims and might be inaccurate. Costs were modeled rather than fully implemented. Conclusion: Dermatologists should be aware of bundled payment models. More work is needed to elucidate the optimal formulation of a bundled payment for AK management, including the services covered, time delimitation, and risk stratification factors.
AB - Background: There is an opportunity to explore alternate payment models in dermatology. Objective: To pilot 2 bundled payment models for actinic keratosis (AK) management. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted during September 2013-June 2016. Consecutive patients were recruited from clinics of 5 dermatologists. Patients had to be adults, have ≥1 year of care at the department, and have a history of AK. A bundled payment strategy was prospectively piloted for 1 year and compared with costs in the prior year. Results: Overall, 400 participants were enrolled, and complete data was collected for 254 participants. During the year of bundled payments, actual total annual spending on claims was $70,557, whereas model 1 and model 2 bundled payment models would have totaled $67,310 and $74,422, respectively, for the patient cohort. Patient satisfaction surveys showed no difference in the quality of care. Limitations: Single-center study and limited sample size. International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 codes were used to identify claims and might be inaccurate. Costs were modeled rather than fully implemented. Conclusion: Dermatologists should be aware of bundled payment models. More work is needed to elucidate the optimal formulation of a bundled payment for AK management, including the services covered, time delimitation, and risk stratification factors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061215892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061215892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.09.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.09.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 30744876
AN - SCOPUS:85061215892
SN - 0190-9622
VL - 80
SP - 679
EP - 684
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
IS - 3
ER -