C3 in the 10-20 system may not be the best target for the motor hand area

Hakjoo Kim, David L. Wright, Joohyun Rhee, Taewon Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The C3 region in the international 10-20 system for electroencephalography (EEG) recording is assumed to represent the right motor hand area. Therefore, in the absence of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or a neuronavigational system, neuromodulation methods, such as transcranial direct current stimulation, target C3 or C4, based on the international 10-20 system, to influence the cortical excitability of the right and left hand, respectively. The purpose of this study is to compare the peak-to-peak motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes of the right first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscle after single-pulse TMS at C3 and C1 in the 10-20 system and at the region between C3 and C1 (i.e., C3h in the 10-5 system). Using an intensity of 110% of the resting motor threshold, 15 individual MEPs from each of C3, C3h, C1, and hotspots were randomly recorded from FDI for sixteen right-handed undergraduate students. Average MEPs were greatest at C3h and C1, with both being larger than those recorded at C3. These data are congruent with recent findings using topographic analysis of individual MRIs that revealed poor correspondence between C3/C4 and the respective hand knob. Implications for the use of scalp locations determined using the 10-20 system for localizing the hand area are highlighted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number148311
JournalBrain research
Volume1807
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2023

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Developmental Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'C3 in the 10-20 system may not be the best target for the motor hand area'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this