Calling It Quits: Legislative Retirements in Comparative Perspective

Christopher D. Raymond, L. Marvin Overby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


Although retirements are a major source of legislative turnover, research on the topic has been limited, especially outside of the US House of Representatives. In this article, we address this shortcoming by examining retirements in two countries with similar electoral systems yet different legislative environments and party systems: Canada and the United Kingdom. In particular, we extend analysis on the Congress that has consistently shown Republican members retire at higher rates than their Democratic counterparts to examine whether this finding is generalizable to legislators from other parties of the right and/or favouring devolution in other parliamentary settings. In presenting data that support many of these hypotheses, we explore an important normative implication: because their partisan predispositions make them less willing to serve, politicians from parties favouring limited government and/or devolution may be less able to translate their vision of politics into policy because they face systemic problems maintaining legislative seats.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)731-748
Number of pages18
JournalPolitical Studies
Issue number3
StatePublished - Aug 1 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Calling It Quits: Legislative Retirements in Comparative Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this