Abstract
The medical-legal partnership (MLP) and reproductive justice (RJ) movements both seek to solve complex problems, serve diverse populations with intersectional challenges, and resolve community conditions that impact people’s ability to reach their highest health potential. Yet MLPs have been overlooked as a strategy to advance reproductive health and justice. MLP has distinct advantages for advancing RJ, and many MLPs might already be doing RJ work without referring to it by name. By intentionally adopting an RJ strategy and explicitly addressing the unmet social and legal needs that limit people’s ability to plan their reproductive futures, MLPs can better serve their clients and contribute to the movement to combat reproductive oppression.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 655-664 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | AMA Journal of Ethics |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Health(social science)
- Health Policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can Medical-Legal Partnerships Do More to Advance Reproductive Justice After Dobbs?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver