TY - JOUR
T1 - Caseworker assessment of child risk and functioning and their relation to service use in the child welfare system
AU - Connell, Christian M.
AU - Bory, Christopher T.
AU - Huang, Cindy Y.
AU - Genovese, Maegan
AU - Caron, Colleen
AU - Tebes, Jacob Kraemer
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was funded through the Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth, and Families (RIDCYF). Support for Dr. Huang was provided by a National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) funded Postdoctoral Training Program (T32 DA019426). The authors would like to acknowledge the following people for their support and feedback on this study: The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of assistance and support made by Lauren Moss-Racusin, The Consultation Center, and Leon Saunders and David Allenson, RIDCYF, to the completion of this article. In addition, the authors want to thank members of the Division of Prevention and Community Research, Yale University School of Medicine, for helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier draft of the article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Children within the child welfare system are more likely to experience emotional and behavioral problems than children not involved with the system. Many states have adopted standardized risk and assessment measures to inform decision-making on appropriate levels of care related to placement or service intensity for children within the system. This study examined the relationship of caseworker ratings of risk across multiple domains to youth functioning and service use for a sample of children open to the child welfare system. The study identified a stratified random sample of youth who were between the ages of five and 21 and open to the child welfare system (n = 184). Stratification was based on current placement (i.e., in-home, foster home, congregate care, and juvenile justice placements). Administrative data was used to access caseworker ratings of risk across child, parent, and family domains using a standardized risk assessment tool. Children's caseworkers (n = 103) completed a standardized measure of child functioning and reported on youth utilization of services across multiple sectors including specialty mental health, school-based, juvenile justice, and medical settings. Regression analyses using variance-corrected estimation for clustered data (by caseworker) revealed higher levels of child risk were associated with poorer child functioning, which, in turn, were associated with higher rates of multi-sector service use. Recommendations and future directions are discussed.
AB - Children within the child welfare system are more likely to experience emotional and behavioral problems than children not involved with the system. Many states have adopted standardized risk and assessment measures to inform decision-making on appropriate levels of care related to placement or service intensity for children within the system. This study examined the relationship of caseworker ratings of risk across multiple domains to youth functioning and service use for a sample of children open to the child welfare system. The study identified a stratified random sample of youth who were between the ages of five and 21 and open to the child welfare system (n = 184). Stratification was based on current placement (i.e., in-home, foster home, congregate care, and juvenile justice placements). Administrative data was used to access caseworker ratings of risk across child, parent, and family domains using a standardized risk assessment tool. Children's caseworkers (n = 103) completed a standardized measure of child functioning and reported on youth utilization of services across multiple sectors including specialty mental health, school-based, juvenile justice, and medical settings. Regression analyses using variance-corrected estimation for clustered data (by caseworker) revealed higher levels of child risk were associated with poorer child functioning, which, in turn, were associated with higher rates of multi-sector service use. Recommendations and future directions are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060732677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060732677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.01.027
DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.01.027
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060732677
SN - 0190-7409
VL - 99
SP - 81
EP - 86
JO - Children and Youth Services Review
JF - Children and Youth Services Review
ER -