Causal inference in transportation safety studies: Comparison of potential outcomes and causal diagrams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations


The research questions that motivate transportation safety studies are causal in nature. Safety researchers typically use observational data to answer such questions, but often without appropriate causal inference methodology. The field of causal inference presents several modeling frameworks for probing empirical data to assess causal relations. This paper focuses on exploring the applicability of two such modeling frameworks-Causal Diagrams and Potential Outcomes-for a specific transportation safety problem. The causal effects of pavement marking retroreflectivity on safety of a road segment were estimated. More specifically, the results based on three different implementations of these frameworks on a real data set were compared: Inverse Propensity Score Weighting with regression adjustment and Propensity Score Matching with regression adjustment versus Causal Bayesian Network. The effect of increased pavement marking retroreflectivity was generally found to reduce the probability of target nighttime crashes. However, we found that the magnitude of the causal effects estimated are sensitive to the method used and to the assumptions being violated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1428-1455
Number of pages28
JournalAnnals of Applied Statistics
Issue number2 B
StatePublished - Jun 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty


Dive into the research topics of 'Causal inference in transportation safety studies: Comparison of potential outcomes and causal diagrams'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this