TY - JOUR
T1 - Caveats in obtaining high-quality 2D materials and property characterization
AU - Subramanian, Shruti
AU - Briggs, Natalie
AU - Shallenberger, Jeffrey
AU - Wetherington, Maxwell T.
AU - Robinson, Joshua A.
N1 - Funding Information:
S.S. and J.A.R. acknowledge the funding from NSF CAREER (Award: 1453924). N.B. and J.A.R. acknowledge the funding for this work that was provided by the Northrop Grumman Mission Systems' University Research Program, Semiconductor Research Corporation Intel/Global Research Collaboration Fellowship Program, task 2741.001, Pennsylvania State University Materials Research Institute's Material Characterization Laboratory. The authors would like to thank Dr. Kehao Zhang whose research results have been used in Figs. 1(d)–1(g) . The authors would also like to acknowledge Azimkhan Kozhakmetov, Dr. Fu Zhang, and Prof. Mauricio Terrones who provided the samples for XPS measurements.
Publisher Copyright:
© Materials Research Society 2020.
PY - 2020/4/28
Y1 - 2020/4/28
N2 - The field of two-dimensional (2D) materials remains a key area of scientific research today, generating continual interest for electronic, sensing, and quantum technology. As the field progresses beyond proof-of-concept devices, experimental and analytical methods and results must be scrutinized to ensure the veracity of scientific claims. Here, some favored synthesis and characterization techniques within the 2D material (2DM) community and certain limitations inherent to these techniques are discussed. The authors highlight select caveats of solid-source and seed-promoted synthesis techniques, such as difficulties in reproducibility and compromised electrical performance of films synthesized with nucleation agents. Furthermore, the importance of careful characterization methodology in determining 2DM layer number, stoichiometry, and dopant effects is discussed. This article is intended to further educate researchers regarding select techniques and claims in the 2DMs field.
AB - The field of two-dimensional (2D) materials remains a key area of scientific research today, generating continual interest for electronic, sensing, and quantum technology. As the field progresses beyond proof-of-concept devices, experimental and analytical methods and results must be scrutinized to ensure the veracity of scientific claims. Here, some favored synthesis and characterization techniques within the 2D material (2DM) community and certain limitations inherent to these techniques are discussed. The authors highlight select caveats of solid-source and seed-promoted synthesis techniques, such as difficulties in reproducibility and compromised electrical performance of films synthesized with nucleation agents. Furthermore, the importance of careful characterization methodology in determining 2DM layer number, stoichiometry, and dopant effects is discussed. This article is intended to further educate researchers regarding select techniques and claims in the 2DMs field.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078502088&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078502088&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1557/jmr.2019.394
DO - 10.1557/jmr.2019.394
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85078502088
SN - 0884-2914
VL - 35
SP - 855
EP - 863
JO - Journal of Materials Research
JF - Journal of Materials Research
IS - 8
ER -