Changes in learning-style preferences: a reply to Ruble and Stout.

M. A. Geiger; J. K. Pinto

doi:10.2466/pr0.1992.70.3c.1072

Changes in learning-style preferences: a reply to Ruble and Stout.

M. A. Geiger, J. K. Pinto

Black School of Business (Behrend)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This note is a reply to Ruble and Stout's 1992 critique of our 1991 study of changes in learning style over time. While some of their comments have merit, the remaining conclusions are that the dimension scores on the Learning Styles Inventory exhibit considerable stability over time and should be analyzed when assessing changes in learning style.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1072-1074
Number of pages	3
Journal	Psychological reports
Volume	70
Issue number	3 Pt 2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1992.70.3c.1072
State	Published - Jun 1992

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

General Psychology

Access to Document

10.2466/pr0.1992.70.3c.1072

Cite this

@article{24f1e707fbcd4075998438c680574fc4,

title = "Changes in learning-style preferences: a reply to Ruble and Stout.",

abstract = "This note is a reply to Ruble and Stout's 1992 critique of our 1991 study of changes in learning style over time. While some of their comments have merit, the remaining conclusions are that the dimension scores on the Learning Styles Inventory exhibit considerable stability over time and should be analyzed when assessing changes in learning style.",

author = "Geiger, {M. A.} and Pinto, {J. K.}",

year = "1992",

month = jun,

doi = "10.2466/pr0.1992.70.3c.1072",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "70",

pages = "1072--1074",

journal = "Psychological reports",

issn = "0033-2941",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "3 Pt 2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in learning-style preferences

T2 - a reply to Ruble and Stout.

AU - Geiger, M. A.

AU - Pinto, J. K.

PY - 1992/6

Y1 - 1992/6

N2 - This note is a reply to Ruble and Stout's 1992 critique of our 1991 study of changes in learning style over time. While some of their comments have merit, the remaining conclusions are that the dimension scores on the Learning Styles Inventory exhibit considerable stability over time and should be analyzed when assessing changes in learning style.

AB - This note is a reply to Ruble and Stout's 1992 critique of our 1991 study of changes in learning style over time. While some of their comments have merit, the remaining conclusions are that the dimension scores on the Learning Styles Inventory exhibit considerable stability over time and should be analyzed when assessing changes in learning style.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026871166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026871166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2466/pr0.1992.70.3c.1072

DO - 10.2466/pr0.1992.70.3c.1072

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 1496074

AN - SCOPUS:0026871166

SN - 0033-2941

VL - 70

SP - 1072

EP - 1074

JO - Psychological reports

JF - Psychological reports

IS - 3 Pt 2

ER -

Changes in learning-style preferences: a reply to Ruble and Stout.

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this