Changes in learning-style preferences: a reply to Ruble and Stout.

M. A. Geiger, J. K. Pinto

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


This note is a reply to Ruble and Stout's 1992 critique of our 1991 study of changes in learning style over time. While some of their comments have merit, the remaining conclusions are that the dimension scores on the Learning Styles Inventory exhibit considerable stability over time and should be analyzed when assessing changes in learning style.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1072-1074
Number of pages3
JournalPsychological reports
Issue number3 Pt 2
StatePublished - Jun 1992

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'Changes in learning-style preferences: a reply to Ruble and Stout.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this