TY - JOUR
T1 - Changes in smoking patterns during pregnancy
AU - Eiden, Rina D.
AU - Homish, Gregory G.
AU - Colder, Craig R.
AU - Schuetze, Pamela
AU - Gray, Teresa R.
AU - Huestis, Marilyn A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the families who participated in the study and research staff who were responsible for data collection. Special thanks to Dr. Amol Lele for collaboration on data collection and Dr. Gerard Connors for collaboration on the larger study. The study was made possible by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes on Health (R01DA019632). Address correspondence to Rina D. Eiden, State University of Buffalo at New York, Research Institute on Addictions, 1021 Main Street, Buffalo, 14203, New York, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - This study examined trajectories of smoking during pregnancy among low-income smokers and differences on demographics, psychopathology, and smoking outcome expectancies among women with different smoking trajectories. The sample consisted of 215 urban pregnant smokers living in the United States. Results indicated four trajectories of smoking and significant changes over time within each trajectory. Persistent smokers had the highest demographic and mental health risks, reported higher craving compared to light smokers, and were more likely to endorse smoking to reduce negative affect, for state enhancement motives. Implications for intervention are discussed. The study was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
AB - This study examined trajectories of smoking during pregnancy among low-income smokers and differences on demographics, psychopathology, and smoking outcome expectancies among women with different smoking trajectories. The sample consisted of 215 urban pregnant smokers living in the United States. Results indicated four trajectories of smoking and significant changes over time within each trajectory. Persistent smokers had the highest demographic and mental health risks, reported higher craving compared to light smokers, and were more likely to endorse smoking to reduce negative affect, for state enhancement motives. Implications for intervention are discussed. The study was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877250760&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877250760&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/10826084.2013.787091
DO - 10.3109/10826084.2013.787091
M3 - Article
C2 - 23581507
AN - SCOPUS:84877250760
SN - 1082-6084
VL - 48
SP - 513
EP - 522
JO - Substance Use and Misuse
JF - Substance Use and Misuse
IS - 7
ER -