TY - JOUR
T1 - Changing course
T2 - supporting a shift to environmental strategies in a state prevention system
AU - Ballard, Parissa J.
AU - Pankratz, Melinda
AU - Wagoner, Kimberly G.
AU - Cornacchione Ross, Jennifer
AU - Rhodes, Scott D.
AU - Azagba, Sunday
AU - Song, Eunyoung Y.
AU - Wolfson, Mark
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Background: This study examines how the North Carolina state prevention system responded to a policy shift from individual-level prevention strategies to environmental strategies from the perspective of the organizations implementing the policy shift. Methods: We use two data sources. First, we conducted interviews to collect qualitative data from key informants. Second, we used prevention provider agency expenditure data from the year the shift was announced and the following year. Results: The interviews allowed us to identify effective features of policy change implementation in complex systems, such as the need for clear communication and guidance about the policy changes. Our interview and expenditure analyses also underscore variation in the level of guidance and oversight provided by implementing agencies to prevention providers. Conclusions: Our analyses suggest that more active monitoring and oversight may have facilitated more consistent implementation of the policy shift toward greater use of environmental prevention strategies.
AB - Background: This study examines how the North Carolina state prevention system responded to a policy shift from individual-level prevention strategies to environmental strategies from the perspective of the organizations implementing the policy shift. Methods: We use two data sources. First, we conducted interviews to collect qualitative data from key informants. Second, we used prevention provider agency expenditure data from the year the shift was announced and the following year. Results: The interviews allowed us to identify effective features of policy change implementation in complex systems, such as the need for clear communication and guidance about the policy changes. Our interview and expenditure analyses also underscore variation in the level of guidance and oversight provided by implementing agencies to prevention providers. Conclusions: Our analyses suggest that more active monitoring and oversight may have facilitated more consistent implementation of the policy shift toward greater use of environmental prevention strategies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099177385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099177385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13011-020-00341-y
DO - 10.1186/s13011-020-00341-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 33430898
AN - SCOPUS:85099177385
SN - 1747-597X
VL - 16
JO - Substance Abuse: Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
JF - Substance Abuse: Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
IS - 1
M1 - 7
ER -