TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterization of pulsed light for microbial inactivation
AU - Cassar, Joshua R.
AU - Mills, Edward W.
AU - Demirci, Ali
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Pulsed light is an emerging technology that can serve as an alternative to current antimicrobial interventions in the food industry. The first objective of this study was to define the spectrum and energy characteristics of pulsed light. The second objective was to establish the germicidal response of Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica ser. Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus (vegetative cells and endospores), Aspergillus niger spores, and Penicillium roqueforti spores were evaluated following pulsed light treatments. Microorganisms were treated using three different broad-spectrum xenon gas flashlamps (Type A: 380–1100 nm, Type B: 235–1100 nm, and Type C: 190–1100 nm) for up to 15 pulses. All microorganisms experienced a significant interaction of flashlamp type × treatment duration (P < 0.0001). Additionally, E. coli was treated with pulsed light with flashlamp type B using light filters to block ultraviolet light and selectively deliver visible (VIS; 380–740 nm), near-infrared (NIR; 700–1080 nm), and VIS-NIR (400–1080 nm) radiation to the cells. The filter type × treatment duration interaction was significant (P < 0.0001). The VIS, NIR, and VIS-NIR filter treatments achieved modest reductions of 0.72, 0.19, and 0.83 Log10 CFU/mL, respectively, after 75 consecutive pulses. To visualize physical effects on cell structures, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained for E. coli following 15 pulse treatments of the three flashlamp types and the type B flashlamp with VIS-NIR filter placement. TEM imaging indicated that damage to cell morphology following treatment by broad-spectrum radiation was negligible. These results indicate that microbial sensitivity to pulsed light treatment differs for species and is predominantly attributed to the ultraviolet portion of the spectrum.
AB - Pulsed light is an emerging technology that can serve as an alternative to current antimicrobial interventions in the food industry. The first objective of this study was to define the spectrum and energy characteristics of pulsed light. The second objective was to establish the germicidal response of Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica ser. Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus (vegetative cells and endospores), Aspergillus niger spores, and Penicillium roqueforti spores were evaluated following pulsed light treatments. Microorganisms were treated using three different broad-spectrum xenon gas flashlamps (Type A: 380–1100 nm, Type B: 235–1100 nm, and Type C: 190–1100 nm) for up to 15 pulses. All microorganisms experienced a significant interaction of flashlamp type × treatment duration (P < 0.0001). Additionally, E. coli was treated with pulsed light with flashlamp type B using light filters to block ultraviolet light and selectively deliver visible (VIS; 380–740 nm), near-infrared (NIR; 700–1080 nm), and VIS-NIR (400–1080 nm) radiation to the cells. The filter type × treatment duration interaction was significant (P < 0.0001). The VIS, NIR, and VIS-NIR filter treatments achieved modest reductions of 0.72, 0.19, and 0.83 Log10 CFU/mL, respectively, after 75 consecutive pulses. To visualize physical effects on cell structures, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained for E. coli following 15 pulse treatments of the three flashlamp types and the type B flashlamp with VIS-NIR filter placement. TEM imaging indicated that damage to cell morphology following treatment by broad-spectrum radiation was negligible. These results indicate that microbial sensitivity to pulsed light treatment differs for species and is predominantly attributed to the ultraviolet portion of the spectrum.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131383145&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131383145&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111152
DO - 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111152
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85131383145
SN - 0260-8774
VL - 334
JO - Journal of Food Engineering
JF - Journal of Food Engineering
M1 - 111152
ER -