TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterizing hydrologic networks
T2 - Developing a tool to enable research of macroscale aquatic networks
AU - Winslow, Luke A.
AU - Hahn, Tobi H.
AU - DeVaul Princiotta, Sarah
AU - Leach, Taylor H.
AU - Rose, Kevin C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Addressing continental scale challenges affecting inland aquatic systems requires data at comparable scales. Critically, local in-situ observations for both lotic and lentic ecosystems are frequently fragmented across federal, state and local agencies, and nonprofit or academic organizations and must be linked to other geospatial data to be useful. To advance macro-scale aquatic ecosystem science, better tools are needed to facilitate dataset integration. Key to integration of aquatic data is the linking of spatial data to the hydrologic network. This integration step is challenging as hydrologic network data are large and cumbersome to manage. Here we develop a new R package, hydrolinks, to ease linking aquatic data to the hydrologic network. We use hydrolinks to evaluate the spatial data quality for all lake and stream sites available through the U.S. Water Quality Portal. We find that 76.5% of lake sites and 13.9% of stream sites do not correspond with mapped waterbodies.
AB - Addressing continental scale challenges affecting inland aquatic systems requires data at comparable scales. Critically, local in-situ observations for both lotic and lentic ecosystems are frequently fragmented across federal, state and local agencies, and nonprofit or academic organizations and must be linked to other geospatial data to be useful. To advance macro-scale aquatic ecosystem science, better tools are needed to facilitate dataset integration. Key to integration of aquatic data is the linking of spatial data to the hydrologic network. This integration step is challenging as hydrologic network data are large and cumbersome to manage. Here we develop a new R package, hydrolinks, to ease linking aquatic data to the hydrologic network. We use hydrolinks to evaluate the spatial data quality for all lake and stream sites available through the U.S. Water Quality Portal. We find that 76.5% of lake sites and 13.9% of stream sites do not correspond with mapped waterbodies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044508313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044508313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.012
DO - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044508313
SN - 1364-8152
VL - 104
SP - 94
EP - 101
JO - Environmental Modelling and Software
JF - Environmental Modelling and Software
ER -