TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterizing Infrasound Station Frequency Response Using Large Earthquakes and Colocated Seismometers
AU - Fee, David
AU - Macpherson, Kenneth
AU - Gabrielson, Thomas
N1 - Funding Information:
Two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments that improved the article. This work was supported by the Nuclear Arms Control Technology (NACT) Program at Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) under Contract Numbers HDTRA121C0030 and HQ003421F0112. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The majority of the AK infrasound stations were supported under the National Science Foundation (NSF) Award Number 2024208. We used ObsPy (Beyreuther et al., 2010) extensively for data analysis and PyGMT (Uieda et al., 2021)to create Figures 1 and 6. Membersof the Wilson Alaska Technical Center provided valuable feedback during the analysis stage of this work. We also thank members of the Alaska Earthquake Center (AEC) in diagnosing and correcting station and metadata issues. The majority of the analysis was done at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, located on the ancestral land of the Dena people of the lower Tanana River.
Funding Information:
Two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments that improved the article. This work was supported by the Nuclear Arms Control Technology (NACT) Program at Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) under Contract Numbers HDTRA121C0030 and HQ003421F0112. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The majority of the AK infrasound stations were supported under the National Science Foundation (NSF) Award Number 2024208. We used ObsPy (Beyreuther et al., 2010) extensively for data analysis and PyGMT (Uieda et al., 2021) to create Figures 1 and 6. Members of the Wilson Alaska Technical Center provided valuable feedback during the analysis stage of this work. We also thank members of the Alaska Earthquake Center (AEC) in diagnosing and correcting station and metadata issues. The majority of the analysis was done at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, located on the ancestral land of the Dena people of the lower Tanana River.
Publisher Copyright:
© Seismological Society of America.
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Earthquakes generate infrasound in multiple ways. Acoustic coupling at the surface from vertical seismic velocity, termed local infrasound, is often recorded by infrasound sensors but has seen relatively little study. Over 140 infrasound stations have recently been deployed in Alaska. Most of these stations have single sensors, rather than arrays, and were originally installed as part of the EarthScope Transportable Array. The single sensor nature, paucity of ground-truth signals, and remoteness makes evaluating their data quality and utility challenging. In addition, despite notable recent advances, infrasound calibration and frequency response evaluation remains challenging, particularly for large networks and retrospective analysis of sensors already installed. Here, we examine local seismoacoustic coupling on colocated seismic and infrasound stations in Alaska. Numerous large earthquakes across the region in recent years generated considerable vertical seismic velocity and local infrasound that were recorded on colocated sensors. We build on previous work and evaluate the full infrasound station frequency response using seismoacoustic coupled waves. By employing targeted signal processing techniques, we show that a single seismometer may be sufficient for characterizing the response of an entire nearby infrasound array. We find that good low frequency (< 1 Hz) infrasound station response estimates can be derived from large (Mw > 7) earthquakes out to at least 1500 km. High infrasound noise levels at some stations and seismic-wave energy focused at low frequencies limit our response estimates. The response of multiple stations in Alaska is found to differ considerably from their metadata and are related to improper installation and erroneous metadata. Our method provides a robust way to remotely examine infrasound station frequency response and examine seismoacoustic coupling, which is being increasingly used in airborne infrasound observations, earthquake magnitude estimation, and other applications.
AB - Earthquakes generate infrasound in multiple ways. Acoustic coupling at the surface from vertical seismic velocity, termed local infrasound, is often recorded by infrasound sensors but has seen relatively little study. Over 140 infrasound stations have recently been deployed in Alaska. Most of these stations have single sensors, rather than arrays, and were originally installed as part of the EarthScope Transportable Array. The single sensor nature, paucity of ground-truth signals, and remoteness makes evaluating their data quality and utility challenging. In addition, despite notable recent advances, infrasound calibration and frequency response evaluation remains challenging, particularly for large networks and retrospective analysis of sensors already installed. Here, we examine local seismoacoustic coupling on colocated seismic and infrasound stations in Alaska. Numerous large earthquakes across the region in recent years generated considerable vertical seismic velocity and local infrasound that were recorded on colocated sensors. We build on previous work and evaluate the full infrasound station frequency response using seismoacoustic coupled waves. By employing targeted signal processing techniques, we show that a single seismometer may be sufficient for characterizing the response of an entire nearby infrasound array. We find that good low frequency (< 1 Hz) infrasound station response estimates can be derived from large (Mw > 7) earthquakes out to at least 1500 km. High infrasound noise levels at some stations and seismic-wave energy focused at low frequencies limit our response estimates. The response of multiple stations in Alaska is found to differ considerably from their metadata and are related to improper installation and erroneous metadata. Our method provides a robust way to remotely examine infrasound station frequency response and examine seismoacoustic coupling, which is being increasingly used in airborne infrasound observations, earthquake magnitude estimation, and other applications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152522447&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85152522447&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1785/0120220226
DO - 10.1785/0120220226
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85152522447
SN - 0037-1106
VL - 113
SP - 1581
EP - 1595
JO - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
JF - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
IS - 4
ER -