TY - JOUR
T1 - Chemical Cues from Entomopathogenic Nematodes Vary Across Three Species with Different Foraging Strategies, Triggering Different Behavioral Responses in Prey and Competitors
AU - Grunseich, John M.
AU - Aguirre, Natalie M.
AU - Thompson, Morgan N.
AU - Ali, Jared G.
AU - Helms, Anjel M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Research was supported by funding from Texas A&M University and the United States Department of Agriculture (NIFA-2017‐67012‐31498).
Funding Information:
We thank the Helms lab members for their assistance with maintaining plants and colonies for experiments. We also thank Micky Eubanks and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback. The research was supported by funding from Texas A&M University and the United States Department of Agriculture (NIFA-2017‐67012‐31498).
Funding Information:
We thank the Helms lab members for their assistance with maintaining plants and colonies for experiments. We also thank Micky Eubanks and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback. The research was supported by funding from Texas A&M University and the United States Department of Agriculture (NIFA-2017‐67012‐31498).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Chemical cues play important roles in predator–prey interactions. Semiochemicals can aid predator foraging and alert prey organisms to the presence of predators. Previous work suggests that predator traits differentially influence prey behavior, however, empirical data on how prey organisms respond to chemical cues from predator species with different hunting strategies, and how foraging predators react to cues from potential competitors, is lacking. Furthermore, most research in this area has focused on aquatic and aboveground terrestrial systems, while interactions among belowground, soiling-dwelling organisms have received relatively little attention. Here, we assessed how chemical cues from three species of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs), each with a different foraging strategy, influenced herbivore (cucumber beetle) and natural enemy (EPN) foraging behavior. We predicted these cues could serve as chemical indicators of increased predation risk, prey availability, or competition. Our findings revealed that foraging cucumber beetle larvae avoided chemical cues from Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (active-foraging cruiser EPNs), but not Steinernema carpocapsae (ambusher EPNs) or Steinernema riobrave (intermediate-foraging EPNs). In contrast, foraging H. bacteriophora EPNs were attracted to cues produced by the two Steinernema species but not conspecific cues. Notably, the three EPN species produced distinct blends of olfactory cues, with only a few semi-conserved compounds across species. These results indicate that a belowground insect herbivore responds differently to chemical cues from different EPN species, with some EPN species avoiding prey detection. Moreover, the active-hunting EPNs were attracted to heterospecific cues, suggesting these cues indicate a greater probability of available prey, rather than strong interspecific competition.
AB - Chemical cues play important roles in predator–prey interactions. Semiochemicals can aid predator foraging and alert prey organisms to the presence of predators. Previous work suggests that predator traits differentially influence prey behavior, however, empirical data on how prey organisms respond to chemical cues from predator species with different hunting strategies, and how foraging predators react to cues from potential competitors, is lacking. Furthermore, most research in this area has focused on aquatic and aboveground terrestrial systems, while interactions among belowground, soiling-dwelling organisms have received relatively little attention. Here, we assessed how chemical cues from three species of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs), each with a different foraging strategy, influenced herbivore (cucumber beetle) and natural enemy (EPN) foraging behavior. We predicted these cues could serve as chemical indicators of increased predation risk, prey availability, or competition. Our findings revealed that foraging cucumber beetle larvae avoided chemical cues from Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (active-foraging cruiser EPNs), but not Steinernema carpocapsae (ambusher EPNs) or Steinernema riobrave (intermediate-foraging EPNs). In contrast, foraging H. bacteriophora EPNs were attracted to cues produced by the two Steinernema species but not conspecific cues. Notably, the three EPN species produced distinct blends of olfactory cues, with only a few semi-conserved compounds across species. These results indicate that a belowground insect herbivore responds differently to chemical cues from different EPN species, with some EPN species avoiding prey detection. Moreover, the active-hunting EPNs were attracted to heterospecific cues, suggesting these cues indicate a greater probability of available prey, rather than strong interspecific competition.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113158857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85113158857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10886-021-01304-8
DO - 10.1007/s10886-021-01304-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 34415500
AN - SCOPUS:85113158857
SN - 0098-0331
VL - 47
SP - 822
EP - 833
JO - Journal of Chemical Ecology
JF - Journal of Chemical Ecology
IS - 10-11
ER -