Chemical reduction of U(VI) by Fe(II) at the solid-water interface using natural and synthetic Fe(III) oxides

Byong Hun Jeon, Brian A. Dempsey, William D. Burgos, Mark O. Barnett, Eric E. Roden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

155 Scopus citations


Abiotic reduction of 0.1 mM U(VI) by Fe(II) in the presence of synthetic iron oxides (biogenic magnetite, goethite, and hematite) and natural Fe(III) oxide-containing solids was investigated in pH 6.8 artificial groundwater containing 10 mM NaHCO 3. In most experiments, more than 95% of added U(VI) was sorbed to solids. U(VI) was rapidly and extensively (≥80%) reduced in the presence of synthetic Fe-(III) oxides and highly Fe(III) oxide-enriched (18-35 wt % Fe) Atlantic coastal plain sediments. In contrast, long-term (20-60 d) U(VI) reduction was less than 30% in suspensions of six other natural solids with relatively low Fe(III) oxide content (1-5 wt % Fe). Fe(II) sorption site density was severalfold lower on these natural solids (0.2-1.1 Fe(II) nm -2) compared to the synthetic Fe(III) oxides (1.6-3.2 Fe(II) nm -2), which may explain the poor U(VI) reduction in the natural solid-containing systems. Addition of the reduced form of the electron shuttling compound anthrahydroquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AH 2DS; final concentration 2.5 mM) to the natural solid suspensions enhanced the rate and extent of U(VI) reduction, suggesting that AH 2-DS reduced U(VI) at surface sites where reaction of U(VI) with sorbed Fe(II) was limited. This study demonstrates that abiotic, Fe(II)-driven U(VI) reduction is likely to be less efficient in natural soils and sediments than would be inferred from studies with synthetic Fe(III) oxides.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5642-5649
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Issue number15
StatePublished - Aug 1 2005

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry


Dive into the research topics of 'Chemical reduction of U(VI) by Fe(II) at the solid-water interface using natural and synthetic Fe(III) oxides'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this