TY - JOUR
T1 - Chiplet/Interposer Co-Design for Power Delivery Network Optimization in Heterogeneous 2.5-D ICs
AU - Kim, Jinwoo
AU - Chekuri, Venkata Chaitanya Krishna
AU - Rahman, Nael Mizanur
AU - Dolatsara, Majid Ahadi
AU - Torun, Hakki Mert
AU - Swaminathan, Madhavan
AU - Mukhopadhyay, Saibal
AU - Lim, Sung Kyu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2011-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - In this article, we present an effective methodology for co-design, co-analysis, and the system-level optimization of chiplet/interposer power delivery network (PDN) in 2.5-D integrated chip (IC) designs. In our methodology, we first generate a commercial-grade heterogeneous 2.5-D IC designs including full signal routing and power delivery. We then perform our PDN co-analysis in frequency and time domains on the entire PDN to evaluate various mechanisms added to our PDN designs. Based on our co-analysis results, we perform the system-level optimization on both interposer and chiplet PDNs with the stable performance of power delivery. Finally, we perform power, performance, and area (PPA) analysis and power integrity (PI) on our 2.5-D designs and discuss tradeoffs in chiplet and interposer levels due to PDN optimization. Our experiments show 27.17% improvement in the overall IR-drop in the optimized 2.5-D IC design by increasing the interposer PDN occupancy by 5.52% and inserting the additional PDN grids in chiplet designs. However, we also observe tradeoffs in terms of PPA and PI. By PDN optimization, the optimized design has an 11.6% increase of the total power, while the area of 2.5-D design remains the same. Moreover, from the perspective of PI, the tradeoffs are shown by 0.6% reduction of power efficiency, 32.6% higher output ripple, and 31.5% higher initial ringing because of an inductive behavior of interposer PDN in the optimized design.
AB - In this article, we present an effective methodology for co-design, co-analysis, and the system-level optimization of chiplet/interposer power delivery network (PDN) in 2.5-D integrated chip (IC) designs. In our methodology, we first generate a commercial-grade heterogeneous 2.5-D IC designs including full signal routing and power delivery. We then perform our PDN co-analysis in frequency and time domains on the entire PDN to evaluate various mechanisms added to our PDN designs. Based on our co-analysis results, we perform the system-level optimization on both interposer and chiplet PDNs with the stable performance of power delivery. Finally, we perform power, performance, and area (PPA) analysis and power integrity (PI) on our 2.5-D designs and discuss tradeoffs in chiplet and interposer levels due to PDN optimization. Our experiments show 27.17% improvement in the overall IR-drop in the optimized 2.5-D IC design by increasing the interposer PDN occupancy by 5.52% and inserting the additional PDN grids in chiplet designs. However, we also observe tradeoffs in terms of PPA and PI. By PDN optimization, the optimized design has an 11.6% increase of the total power, while the area of 2.5-D design remains the same. Moreover, from the perspective of PI, the tradeoffs are shown by 0.6% reduction of power efficiency, 32.6% higher output ripple, and 31.5% higher initial ringing because of an inductive behavior of interposer PDN in the optimized design.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115185311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85115185311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TCPMT.2021.3113664
DO - 10.1109/TCPMT.2021.3113664
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85115185311
SN - 2156-3950
VL - 11
SP - 2148
EP - 2157
JO - IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology
JF - IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology
IS - 12
ER -