TY - JOUR
T1 - Chlordiazepoxide and the Moderation of the Initial Response to Reward Reduction
AU - Flaherty, Charles F.
AU - Grigson, Patricia S.
AU - Lind, Scott
N1 - Funding Information:
Requests for reprints should be sent to Charles Flaherty, Department of Psychology, Busch Campus, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, U.S.A. This research was supported by grants from NIMH (MH-40489) and the Charles and Johanna Busch bequest. The assistance of Jane Baumann and Anthea Dokidis is appreciated.
PY - 1990/2/1
Y1 - 1990/2/1
N2 - The effectiveness of chlordiazepoxide (CDP) in reducing negative contrast on the first day after a shift from 32% to 4% sucrose was investigated in four experiments using rats. Previous studies indicated that CDP was effective on the second, but not on the first postshift day. In Experiments 1 and la, neither initial experience (3 or 10 days) with the eventual postshift 4% solution (i.e. 4%, then 32%, then 4%), nor initial experience with alternating 4% and 32% sucrose, led to a reliable contrast-reducing effect of CDP on the first shift day. Evidence from Experiments 2 and 3 suggested that a range of doses of CDP (3, 5, 10, and 15mg/kg) did not have reliable effects on the first postshift day, although the two lower doses did reduce contrast on the second postshift day (the higher doses were not administered on Day 2). The evidence suggests that the relative ineffectiveness of CDP in moderating the initial response to reward reduction is not related to a problem of recognizing the difference between the postshift solution and the memory of the preshift solution. Alternative interpretations in which CDP's lack of effect on the initial occurrence of contrast is related to an initial stage of unconditioned frustration and/or exploratory behaviour are considered.
AB - The effectiveness of chlordiazepoxide (CDP) in reducing negative contrast on the first day after a shift from 32% to 4% sucrose was investigated in four experiments using rats. Previous studies indicated that CDP was effective on the second, but not on the first postshift day. In Experiments 1 and la, neither initial experience (3 or 10 days) with the eventual postshift 4% solution (i.e. 4%, then 32%, then 4%), nor initial experience with alternating 4% and 32% sucrose, led to a reliable contrast-reducing effect of CDP on the first shift day. Evidence from Experiments 2 and 3 suggested that a range of doses of CDP (3, 5, 10, and 15mg/kg) did not have reliable effects on the first postshift day, although the two lower doses did reduce contrast on the second postshift day (the higher doses were not administered on Day 2). The evidence suggests that the relative ineffectiveness of CDP in moderating the initial response to reward reduction is not related to a problem of recognizing the difference between the postshift solution and the memory of the preshift solution. Alternative interpretations in which CDP's lack of effect on the initial occurrence of contrast is related to an initial stage of unconditioned frustration and/or exploratory behaviour are considered.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025377499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025377499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14640749008401873
DO - 10.1080/14640749008401873
M3 - Article
C2 - 2326496
AN - SCOPUS:0025377499
SN - 0272-4995
VL - 42
SP - 87
EP - 105
JO - The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B
JF - The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B
IS - 1
ER -