Chlordiazepoxide and the Moderation of the Initial Response to Reward Reduction

Charles F. Flaherty, Patricia S. Grigson, Scott Lind

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

The effectiveness of chlordiazepoxide (CDP) in reducing negative contrast on the first day after a shift from 32% to 4% sucrose was investigated in four experiments using rats. Previous studies indicated that CDP was effective on the second, but not on the first postshift day. In Experiments 1 and la, neither initial experience (3 or 10 days) with the eventual postshift 4% solution (i.e. 4%, then 32%, then 4%), nor initial experience with alternating 4% and 32% sucrose, led to a reliable contrast-reducing effect of CDP on the first shift day. Evidence from Experiments 2 and 3 suggested that a range of doses of CDP (3, 5, 10, and 15mg/kg) did not have reliable effects on the first postshift day, although the two lower doses did reduce contrast on the second postshift day (the higher doses were not administered on Day 2). The evidence suggests that the relative ineffectiveness of CDP in moderating the initial response to reward reduction is not related to a problem of recognizing the difference between the postshift solution and the memory of the preshift solution. Alternative interpretations in which CDP's lack of effect on the initial occurrence of contrast is related to an initial stage of unconditioned frustration and/or exploratory behaviour are considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-105
Number of pages19
JournalThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 1990

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physiology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • General Psychology
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chlordiazepoxide and the Moderation of the Initial Response to Reward Reduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this