TY - JOUR
T1 - Chopper-modulated locked in amplified gas chromatography electroantennography part II
T2 - Signal processing and performance comparisons
AU - Myrick, Andrew J.
AU - Baker, Thomas C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received April 17, 2012; revised June 19, 2012; accepted June 23, 2012. Date of publication July 3, 2012; date of current version August 7, 2012. This work was supported in part by the Office of Naval Research under the Counter-IED Program, and by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency under project New Concepts in Nano-Scale Chemical and Biological Sensing. The associate editor coordinating the review of this paper and approving it for publication was Prof. Sandro Carrara.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - A new method that improves gas-chromatography-electroantennographic detection through lock-in amplification is demonstrated. Here, measurements of antennal responses to major pheromone component, Z11-16:Ald, are performed under more optimal conditions, using saline electrical connections to excise antennae from male H. subflexa. Matched filtering in colored noise is applied to traditional enhanced graphics adapter recordings, allowing the signal to noise ratio of to be increased by about 6.1 dB (uncertainty is dependent on dosage). A dose-response model, including model parameter uncertainties is then used to estimate and compare performance in terms of nave error rates involved in the detection of insect responses to GC peaks. Results indicate that relative performance is dosage dependent. Without a visible flame ionization detector (FID) reference peak for determining elution time, the model predicts the detection limit (placed at 5.0% expected nave error rate) to be approximately 12 times lower using chopper modulation than when using traditional methods. At the highest traditional dosage tested, 10 pg, the equivalent chopper modulated dosage is estimated to be about 92 times lower. When a reference FID peak is clearly visible, the predicted detection limit (at 5.0% expected nave error rate) is expected to be approximately 7 times lower using chopper modulation than when using traditional methods. At the traditional dosage of 10 pg, the predicted equivalent chopped dosage is estimated to be about 66 times lower.
AB - A new method that improves gas-chromatography-electroantennographic detection through lock-in amplification is demonstrated. Here, measurements of antennal responses to major pheromone component, Z11-16:Ald, are performed under more optimal conditions, using saline electrical connections to excise antennae from male H. subflexa. Matched filtering in colored noise is applied to traditional enhanced graphics adapter recordings, allowing the signal to noise ratio of to be increased by about 6.1 dB (uncertainty is dependent on dosage). A dose-response model, including model parameter uncertainties is then used to estimate and compare performance in terms of nave error rates involved in the detection of insect responses to GC peaks. Results indicate that relative performance is dosage dependent. Without a visible flame ionization detector (FID) reference peak for determining elution time, the model predicts the detection limit (placed at 5.0% expected nave error rate) to be approximately 12 times lower using chopper modulation than when using traditional methods. At the highest traditional dosage tested, 10 pg, the equivalent chopper modulated dosage is estimated to be about 92 times lower. When a reference FID peak is clearly visible, the predicted detection limit (at 5.0% expected nave error rate) is expected to be approximately 7 times lower using chopper modulation than when using traditional methods. At the traditional dosage of 10 pg, the predicted equivalent chopped dosage is estimated to be about 66 times lower.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865245203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865245203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/JSEN.2012.2206380
DO - 10.1109/JSEN.2012.2206380
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84865245203
SN - 1530-437X
VL - 12
SP - 2974
EP - 2983
JO - IEEE Sensors Journal
JF - IEEE Sensors Journal
IS - 10
M1 - 6230599
ER -