TY - JOUR
T1 - Circadian phase resetting by a single short-duration light exposure
AU - Rahman, Shadab A.
AU - St. Hilaire, Melissa A.
AU - Chang, Anne Marie
AU - Santhi, Nayantara
AU - Duffy, Jeanne F.
AU - Kronauer, Richard E.
AU - Czeisler, Charles A.
AU - Lockley, Steven W.
AU - Klerman, Elizabeth B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Society for Clinical Investigation. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/4/6
Y1 - 2017/4/6
N2 - BACKGROUND. In humans, a single light exposure of 12 minutes and multiple-millisecond light exposures can shift the phase of the circadian pacemaker. We investigated the response of the human circadian pacemaker to a single 15-second or 2-minute light pulse administered during the biological night. METHODS. Twenty-six healthy individuals participated in a 9-day inpatient protocol that included assessment of dim light melatonin onset time (DLMO time) before and after exposure to a single 15-second (n = 8) or 2-minute (n = 12) pulse of bright light (9,500 lux; 4,100 K fluorescent) or control background dim light (<3 lux; n = 6). Phase shifts were calculated as the difference in clock time between the two phase estimates. RESULTS. Both 15-second and 2-minute exposures induced phase delay shifts [median (± SD)] of –34.8 ± 47.2 minutes and –45.4 ± 28.4 minutes, respectively, that were significantly (P = 0.04) greater than the control condition (advance shift: +22.3 ± 51.3 minutes) but were not significantly different from each other. Comparisons with historic data collected under the same conditions confirmed a nonlinear relationship between exposure duration and the magnitude of phase shift. CONCLUSIONS. Our results underscore the exquisite sensitivity of the human pacemaker to even short-duration single exposures to light. These findings may have real-world implications for circadian disruption induced by exposure to brief light stimuli at night.
AB - BACKGROUND. In humans, a single light exposure of 12 minutes and multiple-millisecond light exposures can shift the phase of the circadian pacemaker. We investigated the response of the human circadian pacemaker to a single 15-second or 2-minute light pulse administered during the biological night. METHODS. Twenty-six healthy individuals participated in a 9-day inpatient protocol that included assessment of dim light melatonin onset time (DLMO time) before and after exposure to a single 15-second (n = 8) or 2-minute (n = 12) pulse of bright light (9,500 lux; 4,100 K fluorescent) or control background dim light (<3 lux; n = 6). Phase shifts were calculated as the difference in clock time between the two phase estimates. RESULTS. Both 15-second and 2-minute exposures induced phase delay shifts [median (± SD)] of –34.8 ± 47.2 minutes and –45.4 ± 28.4 minutes, respectively, that were significantly (P = 0.04) greater than the control condition (advance shift: +22.3 ± 51.3 minutes) but were not significantly different from each other. Comparisons with historic data collected under the same conditions confirmed a nonlinear relationship between exposure duration and the magnitude of phase shift. CONCLUSIONS. Our results underscore the exquisite sensitivity of the human pacemaker to even short-duration single exposures to light. These findings may have real-world implications for circadian disruption induced by exposure to brief light stimuli at night.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035106542&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035106542&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1172/jci.insight.89494
DO - 10.1172/jci.insight.89494
M3 - Article
C2 - 28405608
AN - SCOPUS:85035106542
SN - 2379-3708
VL - 2
JO - JCI Insight
JF - JCI Insight
IS - 7
M1 - e89494
ER -