TY - JOUR
T1 - Citizenship in the empowered locality
T2 - An Elaboration, a Critique, and a Partial Test
AU - Lowery, David
AU - Dehoog, Ruth Hoogland
AU - Lyons, William E.
PY - 1992/9
Y1 - 1992/9
N2 - Although liberal and communitarian interpretations of citizenship differ profoundly, they nevertheless offer essentially similar prescriptions in support of empowered localities. The authors argue, instead, that the rejected alternative of consolidated government better promotes both interpretations of effective citizenship. They develop this argument by more fully specifying the behavioral implications of the two views of citizenship and theoretically linking those behaviors to fragmented and consolidated urban institutions using the Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect model introduced by Lyons and Lowery in 1986. They then test the central proposition derived from that analysis using a comparison group design.
AB - Although liberal and communitarian interpretations of citizenship differ profoundly, they nevertheless offer essentially similar prescriptions in support of empowered localities. The authors argue, instead, that the rejected alternative of consolidated government better promotes both interpretations of effective citizenship. They develop this argument by more fully specifying the behavioral implications of the two views of citizenship and theoretically linking those behaviors to fragmented and consolidated urban institutions using the Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect model introduced by Lyons and Lowery in 1986. They then test the central proposition derived from that analysis using a comparison group design.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933495789&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84933495789&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/004208169202800104
DO - 10.1177/004208169202800104
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84933495789
SN - 1078-0874
VL - 28
SP - 69
EP - 103
JO - Urban Affairs Review
JF - Urban Affairs Review
IS - 1
ER -