Abstract
This article re-examines the distinction between native and nonnative students that writing programs adopt in structuring their courses. It critiques the monolingual orientation based on ideologies of language ownership, homogeneity, and territoriality that this distinction is based on and develops a more expansive translingual orientation relevant to diversity in globalization and multilingualism. After articulating the changes involved in facilitating literacy acquisition, it examines the uptake of writing scholars to address their concerns. The article ends by illustrating how policy level changes can be made to accommodate the emerging orientations of translingualism by discussing how New York State secondary school teachers have implemented the Common Core State Standards.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 415-440 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Applied Linguistics Review |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 1 2015 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Clarifying the relationship between translingual practice and L2 writing: Addressing learner identities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver