Classification with imperfect labels for fault prediction

Ya Xue, David P. Williams, Hai Qiu

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Classification techniques have been widely used in fault prediction for industrial systems. However, an inherent issue with this approach is label imperfections in training data, since the line of demarcation between classes is determined based on field expert experience and maintenance capability. To address this issue we propose a noisy-label model in which the labeling noise function is derived from a point of view motivated by reliability analysis. We also present a novel label bootstrapping method that can better reflect the true uncertainty of the labeling process than the standard approach for addressing label imperfections. The proposed technique gives encouraging results on two industrial fault-prediction data sets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Data Mining for Service and Maintenance, KDD4Service 2011 - Held in Conjunction with SIGKDD'11
Pages12-17
Number of pages6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Event1st International Workshop on Data Mining for Service and Maintenance, KDD4Service 2011 - Held in Conjunction with SIGKDD'11 - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: Aug 21 2011Aug 21 2011

Publication series

NameProceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Data Mining for Service and Maintenance, KDD4Service 2011 - Held in Conjunction with SIGKDD'11

Conference

Conference1st International Workshop on Data Mining for Service and Maintenance, KDD4Service 2011 - Held in Conjunction with SIGKDD'11
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period8/21/118/21/11

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Software

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Classification with imperfect labels for fault prediction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this