Classifying errors in preventable and potentially preventable trauma deaths: A 9-year review using the Joint Commission's standardized methodology

Sandra M. Vioque, Patrick K. Kim, Janet McMaster, John Gallagher, Steven R. Allen, Daniel N. Holena, Patrick M. Reilly, Jose L. Pascual

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Benchmarking and classification of avoidable errors in trauma care are difficult as most reports classify errors using variable locally derived schemes. We sought to classify errors in a large trauma population using standardized Joint Commission taxonomy. Methods All preventable/potentially preventable deaths identified at an urban, level-1 trauma center (January 2002 to December 2010) were abstracted from the trauma registry. Errors deemed avoidable were classified within the 5-node (impact, type, domain, cause, and prevention) Joint Commission taxonomy. Results Of the 377 deaths in 11,100 trauma contacts, 106 (7.7%) were preventable/potentially preventable deaths related to 142 avoidable errors. Most common error types were in clinical performance (inaccurate diagnosis). Error domain involved primarily the emergency department (therapeutic interventions), caused mostly by knowledge deficits. Communication improvement was the most common mitigation strategy. Conclusion Standardized classification of errors in preventable trauma deaths most often involve clinical performance in the early phases of care and can be mitigated with universal strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-194
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume208
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Classifying errors in preventable and potentially preventable trauma deaths: A 9-year review using the Joint Commission's standardized methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this