TY - JOUR
T1 - Climate change, agriculture, and water quality in the Chesapeake Bay region
AU - Abler, David
AU - Shortle, James
AU - Carmichael, Jeffrey
AU - Horan, Richard
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is sponsored by University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Subcontract S99-14918, Climate Change, Agriculture, and the Environment; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cooperative Agreement CR 826554-01-0, Mid-Atlantic Regional Assessment; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cooperative Agreement CR 82840701, Mid-Atlantic Regional Assessment Phase II; U.S. Na- tional Science Foundation Grant SBR-9521952, Methods of Integrated Regional Assessment of Global Climate Change; by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cooperative Agreement CR 824369-01, GCC Impacts on Water Resources and Ecosystems; and by U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative Agreement 43-3AEL-8-80058, Agricultural Nonpoint Pollution Control: Environmental Policy Options and the Value of Information. The authors would like to thank the referees for their helpful comments.
PY - 2002/11
Y1 - 2002/11
N2 - Research on climate change and agriculture has largely focused on production, food prices, and producer incomes. However, societal interest in agriculture is much broader than these issues. The objective of this paper is to analyze the potential impacts of climate change on an important negative externality from agriculture, water quality. We construct a simulation model of maize production in twelve watersheds within the U.S. Chesapeake Bay Region that has economic and watershed components linking climate to productivity, production decisions by maize farmers, and nitrogen loadings delivered to the Chesapeake Bay. Maize is an important crop to study because of its importance to the region's agriculture and because it is a major source of nutrient pollution. The model is run under alternative scenarios regarding the future climate, future baseline (without any climate change), whether farmers respond to climate change, whether there are carbon dioxide (CO2) enrichment effects on maize production, and whether agricultural prices facing the region change due to climate change impacts on global agricultural commodity markets. The simulation results differ from one scenario to another on the magnitude and direction of change in nitrogen deliveries to the Chesapeake Bay. The results are highly sensitive to the choice of future baseline scenario and to whether there are CO2 enrichment effects. The results are also highly sensitive to assumptions about the impact of climate change on commodity prices facing farmers in the Chesapeake Bay region. The results indicate that economic responses by farmers to climate change definitely matter. Assuming that farmers do not respond to changes in temperature, precipitation, and atmospheric CO2 levels could lead to mistaken conclusions about the magnitude and direction of environmental impacts.
AB - Research on climate change and agriculture has largely focused on production, food prices, and producer incomes. However, societal interest in agriculture is much broader than these issues. The objective of this paper is to analyze the potential impacts of climate change on an important negative externality from agriculture, water quality. We construct a simulation model of maize production in twelve watersheds within the U.S. Chesapeake Bay Region that has economic and watershed components linking climate to productivity, production decisions by maize farmers, and nitrogen loadings delivered to the Chesapeake Bay. Maize is an important crop to study because of its importance to the region's agriculture and because it is a major source of nutrient pollution. The model is run under alternative scenarios regarding the future climate, future baseline (without any climate change), whether farmers respond to climate change, whether there are carbon dioxide (CO2) enrichment effects on maize production, and whether agricultural prices facing the region change due to climate change impacts on global agricultural commodity markets. The simulation results differ from one scenario to another on the magnitude and direction of change in nitrogen deliveries to the Chesapeake Bay. The results are highly sensitive to the choice of future baseline scenario and to whether there are CO2 enrichment effects. The results are also highly sensitive to assumptions about the impact of climate change on commodity prices facing farmers in the Chesapeake Bay region. The results indicate that economic responses by farmers to climate change definitely matter. Assuming that farmers do not respond to changes in temperature, precipitation, and atmospheric CO2 levels could lead to mistaken conclusions about the magnitude and direction of environmental impacts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036830192&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036830192&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1020570526499
DO - 10.1023/A:1020570526499
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0036830192
SN - 0165-0009
VL - 55
SP - 339
EP - 359
JO - Climatic Change
JF - Climatic Change
IS - 3
ER -