Abstract
Aim: To analyze the impact of slowing the shockwave delivery during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) on the clinical patient outcome and the cost of delivering this service in a community practice. Patients and Methods: The data from 1745 consecutive SWL procedures were analyzed at a freestanding surgery center. About 872 treatments were performed at 120 shocks per minute (fast rate [FR]) and 873 were performed at 60 shocks per minute (slow rate [SR]) using a Lithotron machine. Ninety-nine percent of the patients received 3000 shocks. The location and stone size were similar in both groups. Stone-free rate was determined by a plain film of the abdomen at follow-up. Results: The clinical outcome of SR shows a statistically significant improvement in stone-free rate on all stone locations and stone sizes except for those smaller than 25 mm2. The need for additional secondary treatment decreased from 35.4% to 18.2%. The anesthesia time increased from 26 to 50 minutes per treatment. On the basis of Medicare reimbursement, there was an increase of $28,294 for anesthesia services by going SR. However, the savings realized as a result of decrease in secondary procedures was $264,989, resulting in a total savings of $236,695 during the study period. The cost savings was $271.13 per SWL treatment. Conclusion: The slowing of SWL treatment results in a longer procedure decreasing the time available for treatment; however, the clinical outcome results in improved patient quality of care and decreased cost. Slowing SWL both benefits the patient and decreases the cost of SWL in the community setting.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1483-1486 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Endourology |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2010 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Urology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical and Economic impact of implementation of slow shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of urinary calculi'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver