Clinical decisions made in primary care clinics before and after choosing wisely™

Amanda Kost, Inginia Genao, Jay W. Lee, Stephen R. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations


Background: The Choosing Wisely™ campaign encourages physicians to avoid low-value care. Although widely lauded, no study has examined its impact on clinical decisions made in primary care settings. Methods: We compared clinical decisions made for 5 Choosing Wisely recommendations over two 6-month time periods before and after the campaign launch and an educational intervention to promote it at 3 primary care residency clinics. Results: The rate of recommendations adherence was high (93.2%) at baseline but did significantly increase to 96.5% after the launch. These findings suggest primary care physicians respond to training and publicity in low-value care, though further research is needed. Conclusion: Given that even small decreases of physician test ordering can produce large cost savings, the Choosing Wisely project may help achieve the health care triple aim.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)471-474
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice


Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical decisions made in primary care clinics before and after choosing wisely™'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this