TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical Validation of a Sensitive Test for Saliva Collected in Healthcare and Community Settings with Pooling Utility for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Mass Surveillance
AU - Sahajpal, Nikhil S.
AU - Mondal, Ashis K.
AU - Ananth, Sudha
AU - Njau, Allan
AU - Ahluwalia, Pankaj
AU - Kota, Vamsi
AU - Caspary, Kevin
AU - Ross, Ted M.
AU - Farrell, Michael
AU - Shannon, Michael P.
AU - Fulzele, Sadanand
AU - Chaubey, Alka
AU - Hegde, Madhuri
AU - Rojiani, Amyn M.
AU - Kolhe, Ravindra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - The clinical performance of saliva compared with nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) has shown conflicting results in healthcare and community settings. In the present study, a total of 429 matched NPS and saliva sample pairs, collected in either healthcare or community setting, were evaluated. Phase-1 (protocol U) tested 240 matched NPS and saliva sample pairs; phase 2 (SalivaAll protocol) tested 189 matched NPS and saliva sample pairs, with an additional sample homogenization step before RNA extraction. A total of 85 saliva samples were evaluated with both protocols. In phase-1, 28.3% (68/240) samples tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from saliva, NPS, or both. The detection rate from saliva was lower compared with that from NPS samples (50.0% versus 89.7%). In phase-2, 50.2% (95/189) samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from saliva, NPS, or both. The detection rate from saliva was higher compared with that from NPS samples (97.8% versus 78.9%). Of the 85 saliva samples evaluated with both protocols, the detection rate was 100% for samples tested with SalivaAll, and 36.7% with protocol U. The limit of detection with SalivaAll protocol was 20 to 60 copies/mL. The pooled testing approach demonstrated a 95% positive and 100% negative percentage agreement. This protocol for saliva samples results in higher sensitivity compared with NPS samples and breaks the barrier to using pooled saliva for SARS-CoV-2 testing.
AB - The clinical performance of saliva compared with nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) has shown conflicting results in healthcare and community settings. In the present study, a total of 429 matched NPS and saliva sample pairs, collected in either healthcare or community setting, were evaluated. Phase-1 (protocol U) tested 240 matched NPS and saliva sample pairs; phase 2 (SalivaAll protocol) tested 189 matched NPS and saliva sample pairs, with an additional sample homogenization step before RNA extraction. A total of 85 saliva samples were evaluated with both protocols. In phase-1, 28.3% (68/240) samples tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from saliva, NPS, or both. The detection rate from saliva was lower compared with that from NPS samples (50.0% versus 89.7%). In phase-2, 50.2% (95/189) samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from saliva, NPS, or both. The detection rate from saliva was higher compared with that from NPS samples (97.8% versus 78.9%). Of the 85 saliva samples evaluated with both protocols, the detection rate was 100% for samples tested with SalivaAll, and 36.7% with protocol U. The limit of detection with SalivaAll protocol was 20 to 60 copies/mL. The pooled testing approach demonstrated a 95% positive and 100% negative percentage agreement. This protocol for saliva samples results in higher sensitivity compared with NPS samples and breaks the barrier to using pooled saliva for SARS-CoV-2 testing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108998722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85108998722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.04.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.04.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 33957320
AN - SCOPUS:85108998722
SN - 1525-1578
VL - 23
SP - 788
EP - 795
JO - Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
JF - Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
IS - 7
ER -