TY - GEN
T1 - Cockpit decision-aids for the task of emergency trajectory generation
AU - Chen, Ted L.
AU - Pritchett, Amy R.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - This paper examines the application of intelligent cockpit systems to aid pilots at the task of generating (and then following) a safe four dimensional trajectory to the runway threshold during emergencies. A proof-of-concept system is described, including the use of embedded fast-time simulation to predict the trajectory defined by a series of discrete actions, and the pilot interface. Then, the results of a flight simulator evaluation with airline pilots are detailed. The inability of pilots to fully realize the consequences of their planned actions in very aggressive maneuvers indicates a need for cockpit aids. However, results also suggest that, for the use of the tool to be operationally feasible, it must be capable of suggesting safe trajectories to the pilot; one version of the system that only verified plans entered by the pilot was found to have significantly detrimental effects on performance and on pilot workload. Results also highlight that the trajectories suggested by the system must capture the context of the emergency; for example, in some emergencies pilots were found willing to violate flight envelope limits to reduce time in flight - in other emergencies the opposite was found. This paper then concludes with recommendations for future cockpit systems.
AB - This paper examines the application of intelligent cockpit systems to aid pilots at the task of generating (and then following) a safe four dimensional trajectory to the runway threshold during emergencies. A proof-of-concept system is described, including the use of embedded fast-time simulation to predict the trajectory defined by a series of discrete actions, and the pilot interface. Then, the results of a flight simulator evaluation with airline pilots are detailed. The inability of pilots to fully realize the consequences of their planned actions in very aggressive maneuvers indicates a need for cockpit aids. However, results also suggest that, for the use of the tool to be operationally feasible, it must be capable of suggesting safe trajectories to the pilot; one version of the system that only verified plans entered by the pilot was found to have significantly detrimental effects on performance and on pilot workload. Results also highlight that the trajectories suggested by the system must capture the context of the emergency; for example, in some emergencies pilots were found willing to violate flight envelope limits to reduce time in flight - in other emergencies the opposite was found. This paper then concludes with recommendations for future cockpit systems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088719910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088719910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2001-4268
DO - 10.2514/6.2001-4268
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85088719910
SN - 9781563479786
T3 - AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit
BT - AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.
T2 - AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit 2001
Y2 - 6 August 2001 through 9 August 2001
ER -