Collective Privacy Sensemaking on Social Media about Period and Fertility Tracking post Roe v. Wade

Qiurong Song, Renkai Ma, Yubo Kou, Xinning Gui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, which has led to full bans on most abortions in 14 states within one year. Many people in the U.S. use period and fertility tracking apps for reproductive healthcare and concerns have arisen about the privacy risks these apps might pose in the wake of Roe reversal. Existing literature on privacy risks of period and fertility tracking apps has primarily examined the privacy policies and practices of these apps. However, how users make sense of the privacy risks of these apps, especially in the post-Roe time, remains understudied. This study explores collective privacy sensemaking on social media, a practice in which people collectively make sense of a privacy situation. Our findings reveal how people contextualize privacy issues, speculate about the associated risks, as well as explore risk mitigation strategies. We conclude with privacy design implications for privacy design in period and fertility tracking apps and contribute insights that could inform policymaking and legal perspectives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number161
JournalProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Volume8
Issue numberCSCW1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 23 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collective Privacy Sensemaking on Social Media about Period and Fertility Tracking post Roe v. Wade'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this