TY - JOUR
T1 - College student drinking
T2 - An examination of theoretical models of drinking tendencies in freshmen and upperclassmen
AU - Turrisi, Rob
AU - Padilla, Kelli K.
AU - Wiersma, Kimberly A.
PY - 2000/7
Y1 - 2000/7
N2 - Objective: The present research contrasted theoretical models of college student drinking tendencies (normative, social control, maturing out). Method: Three groups of students (N = 364; 62.1% female) from a moderately sized northwestern university were examined: traditional freshmen, nontraditional freshmen and upperclassmen. Participants completed measures assessing drinking tendencies, drinking consequences and drinking beliefs. Results: Support for a given theoretical model was dependent upon which outcome variables were being examined (e.g., drinking tendencies vs drinking consequences). Nontraditional freshmen were similar to their traditional freshmen counterparts in the amount of alcohol they consumed but were more like upperclassmen in the experience of consequences of drinking alcohol. Examination of drinking beliefs yielded inconsistent model support. Conclusions: It appears that different types of college students drink for different reasons, suggesting a 'one size fits all' intervention is less likely to be effective. The findings are discussed with respect to different interventions for changing drinking tendencies, drinking consequences and drinking beliefs, and the timing of those interventions.
AB - Objective: The present research contrasted theoretical models of college student drinking tendencies (normative, social control, maturing out). Method: Three groups of students (N = 364; 62.1% female) from a moderately sized northwestern university were examined: traditional freshmen, nontraditional freshmen and upperclassmen. Participants completed measures assessing drinking tendencies, drinking consequences and drinking beliefs. Results: Support for a given theoretical model was dependent upon which outcome variables were being examined (e.g., drinking tendencies vs drinking consequences). Nontraditional freshmen were similar to their traditional freshmen counterparts in the amount of alcohol they consumed but were more like upperclassmen in the experience of consequences of drinking alcohol. Examination of drinking beliefs yielded inconsistent model support. Conclusions: It appears that different types of college students drink for different reasons, suggesting a 'one size fits all' intervention is less likely to be effective. The findings are discussed with respect to different interventions for changing drinking tendencies, drinking consequences and drinking beliefs, and the timing of those interventions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033934218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033934218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15288/jsa.2000.61.598
DO - 10.15288/jsa.2000.61.598
M3 - Article
C2 - 10928730
AN - SCOPUS:0033934218
SN - 0096-882X
VL - 61
SP - 598
EP - 602
JO - Journal of Studies on Alcohol
JF - Journal of Studies on Alcohol
IS - 4
ER -