Abstract
In a recent article, Schmelzer and Tropin [Entropy 2018, 20, 103] presented a critique of several aspects of modern glass science, including various features of glass transition and relaxation, crystallization, and the definition of glass itself. We argue that these criticisms are at odds with well-accepted knowledge in the field from both theory and experiments. The objective of this short comment is to clarify several of these issues.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 703 |
Journal | Entropy |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Sep 13 2018 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Physics and Astronomy