Abstract
In a recent article, Schmelzer and Tropin [Entropy 2018, 20, 103] presented a critique of several aspects of modern glass science, including various features of glass transition and relaxation, crystallization, and the definition of glass itself. We argue that these criticisms are at odds with well-accepted knowledge in the field from both theory and experiments. The objective of this short comment is to clarify several of these issues.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 703 |
| Journal | Entropy |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Sep 13 2018 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Information Systems
- Mathematical Physics
- Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
- General Physics and Astronomy
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on "Glass transition, crystallization of glass-forming melts, and entropy" Entropy 2018, 20, 103'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver